Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199705›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Neuronal Oscillations in Various Frequency Bands Differ between Pain and Touch.

Georgios Michail, Christian Dresel, Viktor Witkovský, Anne Stankewitz, Enrico Schulz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Human neuromarkers of tactile perception: state of the art in methods and findings.Converging clinical and engineering research on neurorehabilitation IV : proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Neurorehabilitation (ICNR2020), October 13-16, 2020. International Conference on Neurorehabilitation (5th : 2020... · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Georgios MichailDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany; Neurophysics Group, Department of Neurology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Christian DreselDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany.
Viktor WitkovskýDepartment of Theoretical Methods, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Anne StankewitzDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität München Munich, Germany.
Enrico SchulzDepartment of Neurology, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany; TUM-Neuroimaging Center, Technische Universität MünchenMunich, Germany; Oxford Centre for Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of OxfordOxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although humans are generally capable of distinguishing single events of pain or touch, recent research suggested that both modalities activate a network of similar brain regions. By contrast, less attention has been paid to which processes uniquely contribute to each modality. The present study investigated the neuronal oscillations that enable a subject to process pain and touch as well as to evaluate the intensity of both modalities by means of Electroencephalography. Nineteen healthy subjects were asked to rate the intensity of each stimulus at single trial level. By computing Linear mixed effects models (LME) encoding of both modalities was explored by relating stimulus intensities to brain responses. While the intensity of single touch trials is encoded only by theta activity, pain perception is encoded by theta, alpha and gamma activity. Beta activity in the tactile domain shows an on/off like characteristic in response to touch which was not observed in the pain domain. Our results enhance recent findings pointing to the contribution of different neuronal oscillations to the processing of nociceptive and tactile stimuli.

Indexed as

EEGintensity codingneuronal oscillationspainperceptiontime-frequency analysistouch

Identifiers

PMID27199705
PMCPMC4850848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.