Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199692›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2016

Persistent Impact of In utero Irradiation on Mouse Brain Structure and Function Characterized by MR Imaging and Behavioral Analysis.

Tine Verreet, Janaki Raman Rangarajan, Roel Quintens, Mieke Verslegers, Adrian C Lo, Kristof Govaerts, Mieke Neefs, Liselotte Leysen, Sarah Baatout, Frederik Maes and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. DNA damage and repair: underlying mechanisms leading to microcephaly.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Biological basis of radiation protection needs rejuvenation.International journal of radiation biology · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tine VerreetLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN)Mol, Belgium; Laboratory of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Janaki Raman RangarajanFaculty of Medicine, Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Medical Image Research Center, University Hospital LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Roel QuintensLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) Mol, Belgium.
Mieke VerslegersLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) Mol, Belgium.
Adrian C LoLaboratory of Biological Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Kristof GovaertsBiomedical MRI Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Mieke NeefsLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) Mol, Belgium.
Liselotte LeysenLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) Mol, Belgium.
Sarah BaatoutLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) Mol, Belgium.
Frederik MaesDepartment of Electrical Engineering (ESAT/PSI), Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and Medical Image Research Center, University Hospital Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Uwe HimmelreichFaculty of Medicine, Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuven, Belgium; Biomedical MRI Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Katholieke Universiteit LeuvenLeuven, Belgium.
Rudi D'HoogeLaboratory of Biological Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Lieve MoonsLaboratory of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration, Animal Physiology and Neurobiology Section, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Leuven, Belgium.
Mohammed A BenotmaneLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre (SCK•CEN) Mol, Belgium.
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre · BEKU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prenatal irradiation is known to perturb brain development. Epidemiological studies revealed that radiation exposure during weeks 8-15 of pregnancy was associated with an increased occurrence of mental disability and microcephaly. Such neurological deficits were reproduced in animal models, in which rodent behavioral testing is an often used tool to evaluate radiation-induced defective brain functionality. However, up to now, animal studies suggested a threshold dose of around 0.30 Gray (Gy) below which no behavioral alterations can be observed, while human studies hinted at late defects after exposure to doses as low as 0.10 Gy. Here, we acutely irradiated pregnant mice at embryonic day 11 with doses ranging from 0.10 to 1.00 Gy. A thorough investigation of the dose-response relationship of altered brain function and architecture following in utero irradiation was achieved using a behavioral test battery and volumetric 3D T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We found dose-dependent changes in cage activity, social behavior, anxiety-related exploration, and spatio-cognitive performance. Although behavioral alterations in low-dose exposed animals were mild, we did unveil that both emotionality and higher cognitive abilities were affected in mice exposed to ≥0.10 Gy. Microcephaly was apparent from 0.33 Gy onwards and accompanied by deviations in regional brain volumes as compared to controls. Of note, total brain volume and the relative volume of the ventricles, frontal and posterior cerebral cortex, cerebellum, and striatum were most strongly correlated to altered behavioral parameters. Taken together, we present conclusive evidence for persistent low-dose effects after prenatal irradiation in mice and provide a better understanding of the correlation between their brain size and performance in behavioral tests.

Indexed as

brain developmentcognitionmicrocephalyMRIradiation exposuresociability

Identifiers

PMID27199692
PMCPMC4854899
OpenAlexW2346798331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.