ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016
Clarifying CLARITY: Quantitative Optimization of the Diffusion Based Delipidation Protocol for Genetically Labeled Tissue.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- A modular framework for multi-scale tissue imaging and neuronal segmentation.Nature communications · 2024Article
- CLARITY increases sensitivity and specificity of fluorescence immunostaining in long-term archived human brain tissue.BMC biology · 2023Article
- Quantitative analysis of metastatic breast cancer in mice using deep learning on cryo-image data.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Tutorial: practical considerations for tissue clearing and imaging.Nature protocols · 2021Review
- Transgenic models for investigating the nervous system: Currently available neurofluorescent reporters and potential neuronal markers.Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects · 2020Review
- A Smart Region-Growing Algorithm for Single-Neuron Segmentation From Confocal and 2-Photon Datasets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2020Article
- FACT or PACT: A Comparison between Free-Acrylamide and Acrylamide-Based Passive Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Tissue Clearing for whole Tissue Imaging.Cell journal · 2019Article
- Optical clearing potential of immersion-based agents applied to thick mouse brain sections.PloS one · 2019Article
- Experimental and Computational Methods for the Study of Cerebral Organoids: A Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Review
- Gotta Trace 'em All: A Mini-Review on Tools and Procedures for Segmenting Single Neurons Toward Deciphering the Structural Connectome.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019Review
- Advances in CLARITY-based tissue clearing and imaging.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2018Review
- Hydrogel-Tissue Chemistry: Principles and Applications.Annual review of biophysics · 2018Review
- Quantitative validation of immunofluorescence and lectin staining using reduced CLARITY acrylamide formulations.Brain structure & function · 2018Article
- Optimization of GFP Fluorescence Preservation by a Modified uDISCO Clearing Protocol.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2018Article
- A Manual Segmentation Tool for Three-Dimensional Neuron Datasets.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue clarification has been recently proposed to allow deep tissue imaging without light scattering. The clarification parameters are somewhat arbitrary and dependent on tissue type, source and dimension: every laboratory has its own protocol, but a quantitative approach to determine the optimum clearing time is still lacking. Since the use of transgenic mouse lines that express fluorescent proteins to visualize specific cell populations is widespread, a quantitative approach to determine the optimum clearing time for genetically labeled neurons from thick murine brain slices using CLARITY2 is described. In particular, as the main objective of the delipidation treatment is to clarify tissues, while limiting loss of fluorescent signal, the "goodness" of clarification was evaluated by considering the bulk tissue clarification index (BTCi) and the fraction of the fluorescent marker retained in the slice as easily quantifiable macroscale parameters. Here we describe the approach, illustrating an example of how it can be used to determine the optimum clearing time for 1 mm-thick cerebellar slice from transgenic L7GFP mice, in which Purkinje neurons express the GFP (green fluorescent protein) tag. To validate the method, we evaluated confocal stacks of our samples using standard image processing indices (i.e., the mean pixel intensity of neurons and the contrast-to-noise ratio) as figures of merit for image quality. The results show that detergent-based delipidation for more than 5 days does not increase tissue clarity but the fraction of GFP in the tissue continues to diminish. The optimum clearing time for 1 mm-thick slices was thus identified as 5 days, which is the best compromise between the increase in light penetration depth due to removal of lipids and a decrease in fluorescent signal as a consequence of protein loss: further clearing does not improve tissue transparency, but only leads to more protein removal or degradation. The rigorous quantitative approach described can be generalized to any clarification method to identify the moment when the clearing process should be terminated to avoid useless protein loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.