Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199631›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Human Brain Expansion during Evolution Is Independent of Fire Control and Cooking.

Alianda M Cornélio, Ruben E de Bittencourt-Navarrete, Ricardo de Bittencourt Brum, Claudio M Queiroz, Marcos R Costa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. From fossils to mind.Communications biology · 2023
    Review
  5. The evolution of synaptic and cognitive capacity: Insights from the nervous system transcriptome ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cerebral cortical folding, parcellation, and connectivity in humans, nonhuman primates, and mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  11. Meat and Nicotinamide: A Causal Role in Human Evolution, History, and Demographics.International journal of tryptophan research : IJTR · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alianda M CornélioBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatal, Brazil; Department of Morphology, Center of Biosciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do NorteNatal, Brazil.
Ruben E de Bittencourt-NavarreteDepartment of Physiology, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora, Brazil.
Ricardo de Bittencourt BrumBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Claudio M QueirozBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.
Marcos R CostaBrain Institute, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Natal, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What makes humans unique? This question has fascinated scientists and philosophers for centuries and it is still a matter of intense debate. Nowadays, human brain expansion during evolution has been acknowledged to explain our empowered cognitive capabilities. The drivers for such accelerated expansion remain, however, largely unknown. In this sense, studies have suggested that the cooking of food could be a pre-requisite for the expansion of brain size in early hominins. However, this appealing hypothesis is only supported by a mathematical model suggesting that the increasing number of neurons in the brain would constrain body size among primates due to a limited amount of calories obtained from diets. Here, we show, by using a similar mathematical model, that a tradeoff between body mass and the number of brain neurons imposed by dietary constraints during hominin evolution is unlikely. Instead, the predictable number of neurons in the hominin brain varies much more in function of foraging efficiency than body mass. We also review archeological data to show that the expansion of the brain volume in the hominin lineage is described by a linear function independent of evidence of fire control, and therefore, thermal processing of food does not account for this phenomenon. Finally, we report experiments in mice showing that thermal processing of meat does not increase its caloric availability in mice. Altogether, our data indicate that cooking is neither sufficient nor necessary to explain hominin brain expansion.

Indexed as

brain sizecookingfire controlhuman evolutionthermal processing of food

Identifiers

PMID27199631
PMCPMC4842772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.