Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199516›Full record

ArticleChinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu2016

Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic hysterectomies and of abdominal hysterectomies: a case study of 4,895 patients in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China.

Hongying He, Zhijun Yang, Dingyuan Zeng, Jiangtao Fan, Xiaoxia Hu, Yuan Ye, Hua Bai, Yanming Jiang, Zhong Lin, Zhiying Lei and 15 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 18 institutions in 1 country.

Hongying HeDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China;
Zhijun YangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China;
Dingyuan ZengDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Liuzhou 545005, China;
Jiangtao FanDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China;
Xiaoxia HuDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530022, China;
Yuan YeDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University, Guilin 541004, China;
Hua BaiDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The Maternal & Child Health Hospital, Nanning 530003, China;
Yanming JiangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Liuzhou, Liuzhou 545006, China;
Zhong LinDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Ruikang Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning 530011, China;
Zhiying LeiDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities, Baise 533000, China;
Xinlin LiDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Liuzhou Maternal & Child Health Hospital, Liuzhou 545000, China;
Lian LiDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Nanning, Nanning 530000, China;
Jinghua GanDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Minzu Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning 530001, China;
Ying LanDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Technology University, Liuzhou 545000, China;
Xiongzhi TangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Guilin, Guilin 541002, China;
Danxia WangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Beihai, Beihai 536100, China;
Junsong JiangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Hechi, Hechi 546300, China;
Xiaoyan WuDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Baise, Baise 533000, China;
Meiying LiDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Yulin, Yulin 537000, China;
Xiaoqing RenDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Wuzhou Worker's Hospital, Wuzhou 543001, China;
Xiaomin YangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The People's Hospital of Guigang, Guigang 537100, China;
Mei LiuDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The First People's Hospital of Qinzhou, Qinzhou 535001, China;
Qinmei WangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, The Third People's Hospital of Liuzhou, Liuzhou 545007, China;
Fuyan JiangDepartment of Gynecological and Obstetrics, Liuzhou Tumor Hospital, Liuzhou 545000, China.
Li LiDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, Cancer Institute and Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China;
Guangxi Medical University · CNLiuzhou General Hospital · CNLiuzhou Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities · CNBaise University · CNBeibu Gulf University · CNBeihai People's Hospital · CNFirst People's Hospital of Nanning · CNFourth Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University · CNGuangxi Maternal and Child Health Hospital · CNGuangxi University · CNGuangxi University of Science and Technology · CNGuigang City People's Hospital · CNGuilin Medical University · CNHechi University · CNLiaoning Provincial People's Hospital · CNThe People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region · CNYulin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic hysterectomy (LH) compared with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) in case of benign gynecological disease.

methodsA multi-center cohort retrospective comparative study of population among 4,895 hysterectomies (3,539 LH vs.1,356 AH) between 2007 and 2013 was involved. Operative time (OT), estimated blood loss (EBL), intra-operative and post-operative complications, passing flatus; days with indwelling catheter, questionnaires covering pelvic floor functions and sexual functions were assessed.

resultsThe EBL (174.1±157.4 vs. 263.1±183.2 cc, LH and AH groups, respectively), passing flatus (38.7±14.1 vs. 48.1±13.2 hours), days with indwelling catheter (1.5±0.6 vs. 2.2±0.8 days), use of analgesics (6.5% vs. 73.1%), intra-operative complication rate (2.4% vs. 4.1%), post-operative complication rate (2.3% vs. 5.7%), post-operative constipation (12.1% vs. 24.6%), mild and serious stress urinary incontinence (SUI) post-operative (P<0.001; P=0.014), and proportion of Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI) total score <26.55 post-operative (P<0.001) of the LH group were significantly less than those of AH group. There were no significant differences in OT (106.5±34.5 vs. 106.2±40.3 min) between the two groups.

conclusionsLH is a safe and efficient operation for improving patients?long-term quality of life (QoL), and LH is a cost-effectiveness procedure for treating benign gynecological disease. LH is superior to AH due to reduced EBL, reduced post-operative pain and earlier passing flatus.

Indexed as

abdominal hysterectomy (AH)Benign gynecological diseaselaparoscopic hysterectomy (LH)quality of life (QoL)

Identifiers

PMID27199516
PMCPMC4865611
OpenAlexW2395500614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.