Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27199082›Full record

ReviewNMR in biomedicine2017

Magnetic susceptibility anisotropy outside the central nervous system.

Russell Dibb, Luke Xie, Hongjiang Wei, Chunlei Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NMR in biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Russell DibbCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Luke XieCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Hongjiang WeiBrain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Chunlei LiuCenter for In Vivo Microscopy, Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

INTEGRATED CENTER FOR IN VIVO MICROSCOPYP41EB015897 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2017
$7.4M
Training in Medical ImagingT32EB001040 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NIGHTINGALE, KATHRYN RADABAUGH · 2003 to 2018
$4.4M
Ultra-Resolution Imaging of Brain Circuitry and its Development in Mental HealthR01MH096979 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIU, CHUNLEI · 2013 to 2017
$1.8M
Agilent Direct Drive 9.4T MRS/MRI ConsoleS10OD010683 · OD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, GEORGE ALLAN · 2012 to 2012
$597k
High-resolution in vivo and non-invasive imaging of myocardial fibersR21HL122759 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LIU, CHUNLEI · 2014 to 2015
$431k
NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL122759NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015897NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001040NIH HHS S10 OD010683NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096979
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic-susceptibility-based MRI has made important contributions to the characterization of tissue microstructure, chemical composition, and organ function. This has motivated a number of studies to explore the link between microstructure and susceptibility in organs and tissues throughout the body, including the kidney, heart, and connective tissue. These organs and tissues have anisotropic magnetic susceptibility properties and cellular organizations that are distinct from the lipid organization of myelin in the brain. For instance, anisotropy is traced to the epithelial lipid orientation in the kidney, the myofilament proteins in the heart, and the collagen fibrils in the knee cartilage. The magnetic susceptibility properties of these and other tissues are quantified using specific MRI tools: susceptibility tensor imaging (STI), quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM), and individual QSM measurements with respect to tubular and filament directions determined from diffusion tensor imaging. These techniques provide complementary and supplementary information to that produced by traditional MRI methods. In the kidney, STI can track tubules in all layers including the cortex, outer medulla, and inner medulla. In the heart, STI detected myofibers throughout the myocardium. QSM in the knee revealed three unique layers in articular cartilage by exploiting the anisotropic susceptibility features of collagen. While QSM and STI are promising tools to study tissue susceptibility, certain technical challenges must be overcome in order to realize routine clinical use. This paper reviews essential experimental findings of susceptibility anisotropy in the body, the underlying mechanisms, and the associated MRI methodologies. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Indexed as

Magnetic FieldsAnimalsAnisotropyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMolecular ImagingReproducibility of ResultsScattering, RadiationSensitivity and SpecificityVisceraanisotropic magnetic susceptibilityquantitative susceptibility mappingresonance frequency shiftsusceptibility tensor imaging

Identifiers

PMID27199082
PMCPMC5112155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.