Efficacy and Safety of Induction Chemotherapy in Esophageal Cancer with Airway Involvement.

purposeEsophageal cancer with tracheobronchial involvement (TBI) has a poor prognosis. Radical therapy carries the risk of inducing tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and treatment-related mortality. Induction chemotherapy followed by reassessment for radical therapy may decrease morbidity and improve outcome.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of esophageal cancer patients with TBI who received induction chemotherapy. Airway involvement was defined as bronchoscopic appearance of a bulge into the lumen, restricted or immobile mucosa, frank infiltration, TEF, or stridor, which was clinically due to airway obstruction from the esophageal lesion.

resultsEighty-three patients were included over 5 years; 97.6 % had squamous histology. All patients received taxane and platinum combination induction chemotherapy; 90.5 % of patients received chemotherapy without dose delays, and 77.8 % patients did not require a dose reduction or modification. The 31.7 % patients had a clinically significant ≥grade 3 toxicity. The objective response rate was 67 % among the patients who underwent restaging scans following induction chemotherapy; 79.5 % of the patients could receive radical intent therapy, either concurrent chemoradiotherapy, or radiation alone, or surgery in one patient. The TEF complication rate was 6 % during the course of therapy. At a median follow-up of 28 months in surviving patients, the estimated median PFS was 8 months (95 % CI 5.5-10.5) and the estimated median OS was 17 months (95 % CI 5.6-28.4). Patients who received radical therapy had a significantly better PFS and OS, p = 0.000.

conclusionsInduction chemotherapy may improve the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer involving the airway and may help select patients for curative treatment and lower the risk of TEF development.