Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27198238›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2016

Preoperative Endoscopy Prior to Bariatric Surgery: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.

Manish Parikh, Jennifer Liu, Dorice Vieira, Demetrios Tzimas, Daniel Horwitz, Andrew Antony, John K Saunders, Akuezunkpa Ude-Welcome, Adam Goodman

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predictive Factors for Developing GERD After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Is Preoperative Endoscopy Necessary?Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Manish ParikhBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA. parikm01@med.nyu.edu.
Jennifer LiuBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Dorice VieiraBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Demetrios TzimasBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Daniel HorwitzBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Andrew AntonyBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
John K SaundersBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Akuezunkpa Ude-WelcomeBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Adam GoodmanBellevue Hospital Center/New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Bellevue Hospital Center · USNYU Langone Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is debate regarding preoperative endoscopy (EGD) in patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Some centers perform EGD routinely in all patients; others perform EGD selectively. The objective of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature to estimate how frequently preoperative EGD changes management.

methodsOur review yielded 28 studies encompassing 6616 patients. Baseline characteristics including age and body mass index (BMI) were included. Patients were grouped based on EGD findings into two groups: Group 1-findings which did not significantly change management (e.g., mild/moderate duodenitis, Grade A/B esophagitis, mild/moderate gastritis, H. pylori infection, hiatal hernia <2 cm); Group 2-findings which delayed, altered, or cancelled surgery (e.g., severe duodenitis, Grade C/D esophagitis, gastric varices, hiatal hernia >2 cm, mass/carcinoma). A general estimating equation (GEE) model accounting for the correlated data within each study was used to calculate confidence intervals around the estimate of how frequently surgery was delayed or altered.

resultsMean age was 41.4 ± 2.9 years, the majority was women, and mean preoperative BMI was 47 ± 3.2 kg/m

conclusionA selective approach to preoperative EGD may be considered, based on the patients' symptoms, risk factors, and type of procedure planned.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryEndoscopy, GastrointestinalAdultFemaleGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPreoperative CareBariatric surgeryEGDEndoscopyGastroscopyPreoperative

Identifiers

PMID27198238
OpenAlexW2401653609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.