Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27198232›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2016

Antimicrobial Consumption in Medicated Feeds in Vietnamese Pig and Poultry Production.

Nguyen Van Cuong, Nguyen Thi Nhung, Nguyen Huu Nghia, Nguyen Thi Mai Hoa, Nguyen Vinh Trung, Guy Thwaites, Juan Carrique-Mas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prevalence and determinants of nasal carriage of penicillin non-susceptibleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Oregano Essential Oil in Livestock and Veterinary Medicine.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Effects of probiotic (Veterinary world · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genomic epidemiological analysis ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  19. Analysis of Antimicrobial Resistance in Non-typhoidalFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nguyen Van CuongOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi NhungOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Huu NghiaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Thi Mai HoaOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Nguyen Vinh TrungDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Pietersbergweg 17, 1105 BM, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Guy ThwaitesOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Juan Carrique-MasOxford University Clinical Research Unit, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Programme, 764 Vo Van Kiet, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. jcarrique-mas@oucru.org.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 110085/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobials are extensively used as growth promoters in animal feeds worldwide, but reliable estimates are lacking. We conducted an internet-based survey of commercial chicken and pig feed products officially approved for sale in Vietnam over the period March-June 2015. Information on the antimicrobial contents in feed products, alongside animal production data, was used to estimate in-feed antimicrobial consumption to produce one kilogram of live animal (chicken, pig), as well as to estimate country-wide antimicrobial consumption through animal feeds. A total of 1462 commercial feed formulations were examined. The survey-adjusted estimated antimicrobial contents were 25.7 and 62.3 mg/kg in chicken and pig feeds, respectively. Overall, it was estimated that 77.4 mg [95% CI 48.1-106.8] and 286.6 mg [95% CI 191.6-418.3] of in-feed antimicrobials were used to raise 1 kg of live chicken and pig, respectively. Bacitracin (15.5% feeds), chlortetracycline (11.4%), and enramycin (10.8%) were the most common antimicrobials present in chicken feed formulations, whereas bacitracin (24.8%), chlortetracycline (23.9%), and florfenicol (17.4%) were the most common in pig feed formulations. Overall, 57% of the total quantitative usage consisted of antimicrobials regarded by WHO of importance for human medicine, including amoxicillin, colistin, tetracyclines, neomycin, lincomycin, and bacitracin. These figures confirm a very high magnitude of in-feed consumption of antimicrobials, especially in pig production. Results from this study should encourage further monitoring of antimicrobials used in animal production, and foster discussion about existing policies on inclusion of antimicrobials in animal feed rations.

Indexed as

Animal FeedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsAnimalsChickensHumansPoultrySwineVietnamAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsanimal productionantimicrobialantimicrobial drug resistanceVietnam

Identifiers

PMID27198232
PMCPMC5063901

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.