Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27197994›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of case reports2016

Clinical Spectrum and Management of Caustic Ingestion: A Case Series Presenting Three Opposing Outcomes.

Antonios I Vezakis, Eirini V Pantiora, Elissaios A Kontis, Vasileios Sakellariou, Dimitrios Theodorou, Georgios Gkiokas, Andreas A Polydorou, Georgios P Fragulidis

Open access · hybridAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of case reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Gastric pull-up in caustic stenosis: presentation of a complex clinical case].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2022
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Antonios I Vezakis2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Eirini V Pantiora2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Elissaios A Kontis2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Vasileios SakellariouDepartment of Surgery, St Luke's Hospital, Panorama, Greece.
Dimitrios TheodorouDepartment of Foregut Surgery, 1st Propaedeutic Surgical Clinic, "Hippokration" General Hospital of Athens, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios Gkiokas2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Andreas A Polydorou2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Georgios P Fragulidis2nd Department of Surgery, Aretaieio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRSt Luke's Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIngestion of caustic substances is a medical emergency in both the adult and pediatric population and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The extent of injuries after ingestion of caustic substances depends on the nature, amount, and concentration of the agent and on the exposure time. Acutely, caustic substances may cause massive hemorrhage and gastrointestinal tract perforation; the most markedly affected cases require urgent surgical treatment. Patients surviving the initial event may present with aorto-enteric or gastrocolic fistulae, esophageal strictures, dysphagia, and increased risk of esophageal cancer as long term sequelae. CASE REPORT: The features of three cases of caustic ingestion are reported to demonstrate significantly different complaints presented at the emergency department. Two patients had free gastric perforation, one at presentation, and one delayed. The third patient presented with late severe strictures of the esophagus and pylorus. The outcomes of the three patients are discussed in detail along with the most current management strategies.

conclusionsAmong adults, ingestion of caustic substances is usually associated with more severe lesions due to the increased amount of ingested substance, as compared with pediatric patients. The most serious presentation is that of visceral perforation, most commonly of the stomach and rarely of the esophagus. Management involves urgent resuscitation with correction of fluid and electrolyte and acid-base abnormalities and immediate surgical exploration in those patients with signs of perforation. Once the perioperative period is managed successfully, the long-term results can be satisfactory. Managing of strictures or else reconstructive procedures must be well timed to allow for psychological and nutritional rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAgedBurns, ChemicalCausticsEmergency Service, HospitalEsophageal StenosisFemaleHumansMiddle AgedStomachCaustics

Identifiers

PMID27197994
PMCPMC4917067
OpenAlexW2403246899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.