Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27197798›Full record

ArticleJournal of laboratory automation2016

3D Printing in the Laboratory: Maximize Time and Funds with Customized and Open-Source Labware.

Meghan Coakley, Darrell E Hurt

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of laboratory automation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06603831 (Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06603831 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized, Prospective and Multicenter Clinical Study for the Clinical Evaluation and Cost-effectiveness Analysis of 3D Digital Surgery in Traumatology and Orthopedic Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorCorporacion Parc TauliRan2024 to 2027Enrolled180ConditionsRadius, Deformity, Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip ArthritisArmspatients treated using 3D technology and Patient-Specific Instrumentation, Patients treated with conventional surgery, without using 3D technology
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Modern flow chemistry - prospect and advantage.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meghan CoakleyBioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch, Office of Cyber Infrastructure and Computational Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Darrell E HurtBioinformatics and Computational Biosciences Branch, Bethesda, MD, USA darrellh@niaid.nih.gov.

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is the computer-guided process of fabricating physical objects by depositing successive layers of material. It has transformed manufacturing across virtually every industry, bringing about incredible advances in research and medicine. The rapidly growing consumer market now includes convenient and affordable "desktop" 3D printers. These are being used in the laboratory to create custom 3D-printed equipment, and a growing community of designers are contributing open-source, cost-effective innovations that can be used by both professionals and enthusiasts. User stories from investigators at the National Institutes of Health and the biomedical research community demonstrate the power of 3D printing to save valuable time and funding. While adoption of 3D printing has been slow in the biosciences to date, the potential is vast. The market predicts that within several years, 3D printers could be commonplace within the home; with so many practical uses for 3D printing, we anticipate that the technology will also play an increasingly important role in the laboratory.

Indexed as

Financial ManagementBiomedical ResearchClinical Laboratory TechniquesPrinting, Three-DimensionalTime Factors3D printingcomputer-assisted designequipmentprototyping

Identifiers

PMID27197798
PMCPMC5380887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.