ArticleEpidemiology and health2016
Age-period-cohort analysis of smoking prevalence among young adults in Korea.
Article in Epidemiology and health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dual use of novel tobacco products and socioeconomic paradox in smoking cessation: An age-period-cohort analysis of KNHANES data 2007-2022.Tobacco induced diseases · 2026Article
- Age-period-cohort analysis of smoking prevalence trends among career military personnel in South Korea.Tobacco induced diseases · 2024Article
- Age, Period, and Cohort Analysis of Smoking Intensity Among Current Smokers in Malaysia, 1996-2015.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2023Article
- An age-period-cohort approach to studying long-term trends in obesity and overweight in England (1992-2019).Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2023Article
- Status of Workers' Health Behavior and the Association between Occupational Characteristics and Health Behavior.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Gender and tobacco epidemic in South Korea: implications from age-period-cohort analysis and the DPSEEA framework.BMJ open · 2022Article
- An age-period-cohort analysis of the difference in smoking prevalence between urban and non-urban areas in Japan (2004-2019).Epidemiology and health · 2020Article
- Factors Associated with Single-Use and Co-Use of Tobacco and Alcohol: A Multinomial Modeling Approach.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- The unrealized potential: cohort effects and age-period-cohort analysis.Epidemiology and health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSmoking prevalence among Korean men in their thirties is substantially high (approximately 50%). An in-depth analysis of smoking trends among young adults in their twenties is necessary to devise antismoking policies for the next 10 years. This study aimed to identify the contributions of age, period, and birth cohort effects on smoking prevalence in young adults.
methodsSubjects comprised 181,136 adults (83,947 men: 46.3%; 97,189 women: 53.7%) aged 19 to 30 years from the 2008-2013 Korea Community Health Survey. Smoking prevalence adjusted with reference to the 2008 population was applied to the age-period-cohort (APC) model to identify the independent effects of each factor.
resultsFor men, smoking prevalence rapidly escalated among subjects aged 19 to 22 years and slowed down among those aged 23 to 30 years, declined during 2008 to 2010 but stabilized during 2011 to 2013, and declined in birth cohorts prior to 1988 but stabilized in subjects born after 1988. However, in APC models, smoking prevalence increased with age in the 1988 to 1991 birth cohort. In this birth cohort, smoking prevalence at age 19 to 20 years was approximately 24% but increased to 40% when the subjects turned 23 to 24 years. For women, smoking prevalence was too low to generate consistent results.
conclusionsOver the past six years and in recent birth cohorts, smoking prevalence in adults aged 19 to 30 years has declined and is stable. Smoking prevalence should be more closely followed as it remains susceptible to an increase depending on antismoking policies or social conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.