Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27197290›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2016

A Tissue Systems Pathology Assay for High-Risk Barrett's Esophagus.

Rebecca J Critchley-Thorne, Lucas C Duits, Jeffrey W Prichard, Jon M Davison, Blair A Jobe, Bruce B Campbell, Yi Zhang, Kathleen A Repa, Lia M Reese, Jinhong Li and 10 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Emerging Biomarkers for Managing Barrett's Esophagus.Gastrointestinal endoscopy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Molecular biomarkers of progression from Barrett's esophagus to esophageal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in gastroenterology (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Utility of ancillary studies in the diagnosis and risk assessment of Barrett's esophagus and dysplasia.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca J Critchley-ThorneCernostics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. rthorne@cernostics.com.
Lucas C DuitsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jeffrey W PrichardDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Jon M DavisonDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Blair A JobeEsophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Bruce B CampbellCernostics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Yi ZhangCernostics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kathleen A RepaCernostics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Lia M ReeseCernostics, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jinhong LiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
David L DiehlDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania.
Nirag C JhalaDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gregory GinsbergDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Maureen DeMarshallDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tyler FoxwellDepartment of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ali H ZaidiEsophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
D Lansing TaylorDrug Discovery Institute and Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anil K RustgiDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jacques J G H M BergmanDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gary W FalkDivision of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Weight loss-induced Microbiome and Adipokine Changes in Barrett's EsophagusU54CA163004 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ABRAMS, JULIAN, RUSTGI, ANIL K · 2011 to 2022
$12.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA163004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBetter methods are needed to predict risk of progression for Barrett's esophagus. We aimed to determine whether a tissue systems pathology approach could predict progression in patients with nondysplastic Barrett's esophagus, indefinite for dysplasia, or low-grade dysplasia.

methodsWe performed a nested case-control study to develop and validate a test that predicts progression of Barrett's esophagus to high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), based upon quantification of epithelial and stromal variables in baseline biopsies. Data were collected from Barrett's esophagus patients at four institutions. Patients who progressed to HGD or EAC in ≥1 year (n = 79) were matched with patients who did not progress (n = 287). Biopsies were assigned randomly to training or validation sets. Immunofluorescence analyses were performed for 14 biomarkers and quantitative biomarker and morphometric features were analyzed. Prognostic features were selected in the training set and combined into classifiers. The top-performing classifier was assessed in the validation set.

resultsA 3-tier, 15-feature classifier was selected in the training set and tested in the validation set. The classifier stratified patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk classes [HR, 9.42; 95% confidence interval, 4.6-19.24 (high-risk vs. low-risk); P < 0.0001]. It also provided independent prognostic information that outperformed predictions based on pathology analysis, segment length, age, sex, or p53 overexpression.

conclusionWe developed a tissue systems pathology test that better predicts risk of progression in Barrett's esophagus than clinicopathologic variables. IMPACT: The test has the potential to improve upon histologic analysis as an objective method to risk stratify Barrett's esophagus patients. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 25(6); 958-68. ©2016 AACR.

Indexed as

Disease ProgressionAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedBarrett EsophagusBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCase-Control StudiesEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansMaleMicroscopy, FluorescenceBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID27197290
PMCPMC4891291
OpenAlexW2386061936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.