Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196624›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2016

Systematic variation of acquisition rate in delay eyelid conditioning.

Hunter E Halverson, Loren C Hoffmann, Yujin Kim, Eszter A Kish, Michael D Mauk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hunter E HalversonCenter for Learning and Memory.
Loren C HoffmannCenter for Learning and Memory.
Yujin KimCenter for Learning and Memory.
Eszter A KishDepartment of Neuroscience.
Michael D MaukCenter for Learning and Memory.ORCID 0000-0002-8208-1873

Funding

REVERSIBLE LESIONS--CEREBELLAR MECHANISMS MOTOR LEARNINGR01MH046904 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 1997 to 2016
$5.5M
Forebrain-Cerebellum Interactions in Trace ConditioningR01MH074006 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAUK, MICHAEL D · 2005 to 2015
$3.3M
Training in Learning and MemoryT32MH106454 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI PRESTON, ALISON R · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046904NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH074006NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH106454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Averaging artifacts inherent in group acquisition curves can mask behavioral phenomena that are potentially revealing in terms of underlying neural mechanisms. To address this, we implemented a behavioral analysis of 106 rabbits trained over 4 sessions using delay eyelid conditioning. Group results showed the typical monotonic increase in conditioned responses (CRs). For most subjects CRs first appeared (as indexed by the criterion of 8 CRs in 9 trials) during the first 18 trials of the second training session. Subdividing subjects according to the training block at which they met criterion revealed systematic differences in the subsequent rate that CR amplitudes increased, but not in asymptotic CR amplitudes. Subjects meeting criterion early in sessions showed more rapid increases in CR amplitude than those meeting criterion later in sessions. This effect was solely dependent on how early within a session criterion was met, as subjects meeting criterion at the beginning of the third and fourth sessions showed more rapid increases in CR amplitude than those meeting criterion after the first 18 trials of the second session. The exceptions were the 7% of the subjects that met criterion late in the first session. Their CR amplitudes increased at a rate similar to subjects meeting criterion early in sessions. These results suggest an interplay between consolidation processes and a previously reported short-term plasticity process that makes CR acquisition a nonmonotonic and complex function of the point during training sessions at which CRs first appear. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

AnimalsConditioning, ClassicalConditioning, EyelidElectric StimulationRabbits

Identifiers

PMID27196624
PMCPMC5458602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.