Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196623›Full record

ArticleBehavioral neuroscience2016

Relating approach-to-target and detection tasks in animal psychoacoustics.

Joseph Sollini, Ana Alves-Pinto, Christian J Sumner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Signal detection: applying analysis methods from psychology to animal behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  2. Mammalian behavior and physiology converge to confirm sharper cochlear tuning in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  3. Spatial Processing Is Frequency Specific in Auditory Cortex But Not in the Midbrain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joseph SolliniMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research.
Ana Alves-PintoMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research.
Christian J SumnerMedical Research Council Institute of Hearing Research.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U135097127Medical Research Council MC_UU_00010/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychophysical experiments seek to measure the limits of perception. While straightforward in humans, in animals they are time consuming. Choosing an appropriate task and interpreting measurements can be challenging. We investigated the localization of high-frequency auditory signals in noise using an "approach-to-target" task in ferrets, how task performance should be interpreted in terms of perception, and how the measurements relate to other types of tasks. To establish their general ability to localize, animals were first trained to discriminate broadband noise from 12 locations. Subsequently we tested their ability to discriminate between band-limited targets at 2 or 3 more widely spaced locations, in a continuous background noise. The ability to discriminate between 3 possible locations (-90°, 0°, 90°) of a 10-kHz pure tone decreased gradually over a wide range (>30 dB) of signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). Location discrimination ability was better for wide band noise targets (0.5 and 2 octave). These results were consistent with localization ability limiting performance for pure tones. Discrimination of pure tones at 2 locations (-90/left, 90/right) was robust at positive SNRs, yielding psychometric functions which fell steeply at negative SNRs. Thresholds for discrimination were similar to previous tone-in-noise thresholds measured in ferrets using a yes/no task. Thus, using an approach-to-target task, sound "localization" in noise can reflect detectability or the ability to localize, depending on the stimulus configuration. Signal-detection-theory-based models were able to account for the results when discriminating between pure tones from 2- and 3-source locations. (PsycINFO Database Record

Indexed as

PsychoacousticsAnimalsAuditory PerceptionFerretsHumansNoisePerceptual MaskingPitch DiscriminationSound Localization

Identifiers

PMID27196623
PMCPMC4961071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.