Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196594›Full record

SynthesisGut2017

Appendectomy does not decrease the risk of future colectomy in UC: results from a large cohort and meta-analysis.

Alyssa Parian, Berkeley Limketkai, Joyce Koh, Steven R Brant, Alain Bitton, Judy H Cho, Richard H Duerr, Dermot P McGovern, Deborah D Proctor, Miguel D Regueiro and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Gut, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Relationship between the appendix and ulcerative colitis: A new discovery.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The appendix and ulcerative colitis - an unsolved connection.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  12. Human intestinal B cells in inflammatory diseases.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ulcerative colitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Alyssa ParianDivision of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Berkeley LimketkaiDivision of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Joyce KohDivision of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Steven R BrantDivision of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Alain BittonDivision of Gastroenterology, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Judy H ChoDivision of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA.
Richard H DuerrDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dermot P McGovernDivision of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Deborah D ProctorDivision of Digestive Disease, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Miguel D RegueiroDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
John D RiouxDivision of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Phil SchummDepartment of Health Studies, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kent D TaylorDivision of Gastroenterology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Mark S SilverbergDivision of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
A Hillary SteinhartDivision of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ruben HernaezDivision of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Mark LazarevDivision of Gastroenterology, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Johns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USMount Sinai Hospital · CAUniversity of Pittsburgh · USMcGill University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · USUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Chicago · USYale University · US

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
UCLA Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000124 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI DUBINETT, STEVEN M. · 2012 to 2015
$57.0M
Using polygenic scores to enhance both variant discovery, and understanding of functional consequences of genetic variation in IBD.P01DK046763 · NIDDK · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI TARGAN, STEPHAN R. · 1992 to 2020
$31.1M
IBD Gene Mapping by Clinical and Population SubsetsU01DK062431 · NIDDK · RUTGERS BIOMEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Steven R Brant · 2002 to 2026
$10.7M
Universite de Montreal IBD Genetics Research CenterU01DK062432 · NIDDK · WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE FOR BIOMEDICAL RES · PI John D. Rioux · 2002 to 2026
$9.6M
NIDDK IBD Genetics Consortium Genetic Research CenterU01DK062420 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DUERR, RICHARD H · 2002 to 2021
$7.8M
Impact of Genetic Variability on Cellular Pathways and Host-Microbiome InteractioU01DK062423 · NIDDK · SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM · PI MARK S. SILVERBERG · 2002 to 2026
$7.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000124NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001881NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK046763NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062420NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062423NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062431NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK062432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesEarly appendectomy is inversely associated with the development of UC. However, the impact of appendectomy on the clinical course of UC is controversial, generally favouring a milder disease course. We aim to describe the effect appendectomy has on the disease course of UC with focus on the timing of appendectomy in relation to UC diagnosis.

designUsing the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Inflammatory Bowel Disease Genetics Consortium database of patients with UC, the risk of colectomy was compared between patients who did and did not undergo appendectomy. In addition, we performed a meta-analysis of studies that examined the association between appendectomy and colectomy.

results2980 patients with UC were initially included. 111 (4.4%) patients with UC had an appendectomy; of which 63 were performed prior to UC diagnosis and 48 after diagnosis. In multivariable analysis, appendectomy performed at any time was an independent risk factor for colectomy (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.1), with appendectomy performed after UC diagnosis most strongly associated with colectomy (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1 to 4.5). An updated meta-analysis showed appendectomy performed either prior to or after UC diagnosis had no effect on colectomy rates.

conclusionsAppendectomy performed at any time in relation to UC diagnosis was not associated with a decrease in severity of disease. In fact, appendectomy after UC diagnosis may be associated with a higher risk of colectomy. These findings question the proposed use of appendectomy as treatment for UC.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAppendectomyColectomyColitis, UlcerativeDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSeverity of Illness IndexSmokingTime FactorsYoung AdultAPPENDIXCOLORECTAL SURGERYINFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASEULCERATIVE COLITIS

Identifiers

PMID27196594
PMCPMC5065377
OpenAlexW2335930934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.