Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196576›Full record

Trial reportGut2017

Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study.

Colin J Rees, Praveen T Rajasekhar, Ana Wilson, Helen Close, Matthew D Rutter, Brian P Saunders, James E East, Rebecca Maier, Morgan Moorghen, Usman Muhammad and 6 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Gut, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01603927 unknown statusnot on this map

Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard 2

TypeobservationalSponsorSouth Tyneside and Sunderland NHS Foundation TrustRan2012 to 2013Enrolled2,500ConditionsColonic PolypsArmsNarrow band imaging for 'optical diagnosis' of colonic polyps (Olympus).
NCT03712059 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

National Colorectal Polyp Care for Diagnosis, Classification and Resection

TypeobservationalSponsorChanghai HospitalRan2018 to 2020Enrolled12,000ConditionsColorectal PolypArmsFIT test and colonoscopy, Polypectomy and biopsy, Classification
NCT04232176 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital Virgen de las NievesRan2019 to 2022Enrolled545ConditionsColonic Polyps, Colon Neoplasms, Colon Cancer, Serrated Adenoma
NCT06773832 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Artificial Intelligence Predicts the Pathology and Endoscopic Classification of Colorectal Polyps During Colonoscopy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorPeking Union Medical College HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsColorectal PolypsArmsReal-time Artificial Intelligence Model for Diagnosing Colorectal Polyp Pathology and Endoscopic Classification
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Endoscopic Assessment of Colorectal Polyps.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Colin J ReesDepartment of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK.
Praveen T RajasekharDepartment of Gastroenterology, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK.
Ana WilsonSt Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Helen CloseDurham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine Pharmacy & Health, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Matthew D RutterSchool of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Brian P SaundersSt Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.
James E EastTranslational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Rebecca MaierDurham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine Pharmacy & Health, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Morgan MoorghenSt Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute, London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Usman MuhammadDurham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine Pharmacy & Health, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Helen HancockDurham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine Pharmacy & Health, Durham University, Stockton-on-Tees, UK.
Anthoor JayaprakashDepartment of Gastroenterology, Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Chris MacDonaldDepartment of Gastroenterology, North Cumbria University Hospitals NHS Trust, Carlisle, UK.
Arvind RamadasDepartment of Gastroenterology, South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesborough, UK.
Anjan DharDepartment of Gastroenterology, County Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington, UK.
James M MasonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Durham University · GBImperial College London · GBNorthern Health and Social Care Trust · GBCounty Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorth Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust · GBNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Mark's Hospital · GBUniversity of Cumbria · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate optical characterisation and removal of small adenomas (<10 mm) at colonoscopy would allow hyperplastic polyps to be left in situ and surveillance intervals to be determined without the need for histopathology. Although accurate in specialist practice the performance of narrow band imaging (NBI), colonoscopy in routine clinical practice is poorly understood.

methodsNBI-assisted optical diagnosis was compared with reference standard histopathological findings in a prospective, blinded study, which recruited adults undergoing routine colonoscopy in six general hospitals in the UK. Participating colonoscopists (N=28) were trained using the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification (relating to colour, vessel structure and surface pattern). By comparing the optical and histological findings in patients with only small polyps, test sensitivity was determined at the patient level using two thresholds: presence of adenoma and need for surveillance. Accuracy of identifying adenomatous polyps <10 mm was compared at the polyp level using hierarchical models, allowing determinants of accuracy to be explored.

findingsOf 1688 patients recruited, 722 (42.8%) had polyps <10 mm with 567 (78.5%) having only polyps <10 mm. Test sensitivity (presence of adenoma, N=499 patients) by NBI optical diagnosis was 83.4% (95% CI 79.6% to 86.9%), significantly less than the 95% sensitivity (p<0.001) this study was powered to detect. Test sensitivity (need for surveillance) was 73.0% (95% CI 66.5% to 79.9%). Analysed at the polyp level, test sensitivity (presence of adenoma, N=1620 polyps) was 76.1% (95% CI 72.8% to 79.1%). In fully adjusted analyses, test sensitivity was 99.4% (95% CI 98.2% to 99.8%) if two or more NICE adenoma characteristics were identified. Neither colonoscopist expertise, confidence in diagnosis nor use of high definition colonoscopy independently improved test accuracy.

interpretationThis large multicentre study demonstrates that NBI optical diagnosis cannot currently be recommended for application in routine clinical practice. Further work is required to evaluate whether variation in test accuracy is related to polyp characteristics or colonoscopist training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01603927).

Indexed as

Narrow Band ImagingPopulation SurveillanceAdenomaAgedClinical CompetenceColonic PolypsColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCOLONIC NEOPLASMSCOLONOSCOPYCOLORECTAL ADENOMASENDOSCOPY

Identifiers

PMID27196576
PMCPMC5531217
OpenAlexW2338997131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.