Trial reportGut2017
Narrow band imaging optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice: the Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard 2 (DISCARD 2) study.
Trial report in Gut, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard 2
National Colorectal Polyp Care for Diagnosis, Classification and Resection
Precision of Optical Diagnosis in Polyps Between 5-15 mm and Its Implications on Surveillance. A Prospective, Multicenter Study.
Artificial Intelligence Predicts the Pathology and Endoscopic Classification of Colorectal Polyps During Colonoscopy
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 210 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy in detecting and diagnosing colorectal tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2025Pooled it
- One in three adenomas could be missed by white-light colonoscopy - findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence and Computer-Aided Diagnosis for the Detection and Characterization of Colorectal Polyps: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Colonic lesion characterization in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Structured Integration of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for the Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps.Gut and liver · 2026Article
- Endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of colon cancer: current evidence and future directions.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Optical Imaging Technologies and Clinical Applications in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Efficacy of additional tissue sections for diminutive colorectal adenomas pathologically diagnosed as normal mucosa: a retrospective, cross-sectional study in Japan.Clinical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Computer-aided diagnosis of colorectal polyps: assisted or autonomous?Clinical endoscopy · 2025Review
- Enhanced diagnostic precision of colorectal sessile lesions with blue laser imaging and JNET classification: a multicenter retrospective study in Chinese cohorts.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Spectrum aided vision enhancer enhances mucosal visualization by hyperspectral imaging in capsule endoscopy.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Endoscopic Assessment of Colorectal Polyps.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2024Review
- Hyperspectral imaging facilitating resect-and-discard strategy through artificial intelligence-assisted diagnosis of colorectal polyps: A pilot study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- White light computer-aided optical diagnosis of diminutive colorectal polyps in routine clinical practice.Endoscopy international open · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Resect-and-Discard and Resect-and-Retrieve Strategies for Diminutive Colonic Polyps.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Computer-aided polyp characterization in colonoscopy: sufficient performance or not?Clinical endoscopy · 2024Review
- Accuracy of polyp characterization by artificial intelligence and endoscopists: a prospective, non-randomized study in a tertiary endoscopy center.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate optical characterisation and removal of small adenomas (<10 mm) at colonoscopy would allow hyperplastic polyps to be left in situ and surveillance intervals to be determined without the need for histopathology. Although accurate in specialist practice the performance of narrow band imaging (NBI), colonoscopy in routine clinical practice is poorly understood.
methodsNBI-assisted optical diagnosis was compared with reference standard histopathological findings in a prospective, blinded study, which recruited adults undergoing routine colonoscopy in six general hospitals in the UK. Participating colonoscopists (N=28) were trained using the NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification (relating to colour, vessel structure and surface pattern). By comparing the optical and histological findings in patients with only small polyps, test sensitivity was determined at the patient level using two thresholds: presence of adenoma and need for surveillance. Accuracy of identifying adenomatous polyps <10 mm was compared at the polyp level using hierarchical models, allowing determinants of accuracy to be explored.
findingsOf 1688 patients recruited, 722 (42.8%) had polyps <10 mm with 567 (78.5%) having only polyps <10 mm. Test sensitivity (presence of adenoma, N=499 patients) by NBI optical diagnosis was 83.4% (95% CI 79.6% to 86.9%), significantly less than the 95% sensitivity (p<0.001) this study was powered to detect. Test sensitivity (need for surveillance) was 73.0% (95% CI 66.5% to 79.9%). Analysed at the polyp level, test sensitivity (presence of adenoma, N=1620 polyps) was 76.1% (95% CI 72.8% to 79.1%). In fully adjusted analyses, test sensitivity was 99.4% (95% CI 98.2% to 99.8%) if two or more NICE adenoma characteristics were identified. Neither colonoscopist expertise, confidence in diagnosis nor use of high definition colonoscopy independently improved test accuracy.
interpretationThis large multicentre study demonstrates that NBI optical diagnosis cannot currently be recommended for application in routine clinical practice. Further work is required to evaluate whether variation in test accuracy is related to polyp characteristics or colonoscopist training. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01603927).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.