Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196439›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2016

Ultrasound for Distal Forearm Fracture: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.

Djoke Douma-den Hamer, Marco H Blanker, Mireille A Edens, Lonneke N Buijteweg, Martijn F Boomsma, Sven H van Helden, Gert-Jan Mauritz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07728227 (Diagnostic Accuracy and Operational Efficiency of Point-of-Care Ultrasound), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07728227 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Diagnostic Accuracy and Operational Efficiency of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Long Bone Fractures: A Brazilian Multicenter Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Sao PauloRan2026 to 2027Enrolled260ConditionsBone Fractures, Long Bone Fracture
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound versus X-ray for distal forearm fractures in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fracture sonography-review of literature and current recommendations.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Ultrasound Applications in Pediatric Orthopedics.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2024
    Article
  20. The 2023 Core Content of advanced emergency medicine ultrasonography.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Djoke Douma-den HamerDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isala hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Marco H BlankerDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Mireille A EdensDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Isala hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Lonneke N BuijtewegDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isala hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Martijn F BoomsmaDepartment of Radiology, Isala hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Sven H van HeldenDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Isala hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Gert-Jan MauritzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Isala hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Isala · NLUniversity of Groningen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

objectiveTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for detecting distal forearm fractures.

methodsA systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA statement. We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library from inception to September 2015. All prospective studies of the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound versus radiography as the reference standard were included. We excluded studies with a retrospective design and those with evidence of verification bias. We assessed the methodological quality of the included studies with the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed a meta-analysis of studies evaluating ultrasound to calculate the pooled sensitivity and specificity with 95% confidence intervals (CI95%) using a bivariate model with random effects. Subgroup and sensitivity analysis were used to examine the effect of methodological differences and other study characteristics.

resultsOut of 867 publications we included 16 studies with 1,204 patients and 641 fractures. The pooled test characteristics for ultrasound were: sensitivity 97% (CI95% 93-99%), specificity 95% (CI95% 89-98%), positive likelihood ratio (LR) 20.0 (8.5-47.2) and negative LR 0.03 (0.01-0.08). The corresponding pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 667 (142-3,133). Apparent differences were shown for method of viewing, with the 6-view method showing higher specificity, positive LR, and DOR, compared to the 4-view method.

conclusionThe present meta-analysis showed that ultrasound has a high accuracy for the diagnosis of distal forearm fractures in children when used by proper viewing method. Based on this, ultrasound should be considered a reliable alternative, which has the advantages of being radiation free.

Indexed as

UltrasonographyForearmHumansLikelihood FunctionsOdds RatioProspective StudiesRadius FracturesReference StandardsReproducibility of ResultsRiskROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityUlna Fractures

Identifiers

PMID27196439
PMCPMC4873261
OpenAlexW2405035945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.