Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196433›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2016

Where to Go: Breaking the Symmetry in Cell Motility.

Sui Huang

Erratum issuedAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Learning-accelerated discovery of immune-tumour interactions.Molecular systems design & engineering · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sui HuangInstitute for Systems Biology, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-3545-4665

Funding

Dynamics of Non-equalibrium Cell State Transitions in Cell PopulationsR01GM109964 · NIGMS · INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS BIOLOGY · PI HUANG, SUI · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell migration in the "correct" direction is pivotal for many biological processes. Although most work is devoted to its molecular mechanisms, the cell's preference for one direction over others, thus overcoming intrinsic random motility, epitomizes a profound principle that underlies all complex systems: the choice of one axis, in structure or motion, from a uniform or symmetric set of options. Explaining directional motility by an external chemo-attractant gradient does not solve but only shifts the problem of causation: whence the gradient? A new study in PLOS Biology shows cell migration in a self-generated gradient, offering an opportunity to take a broader look at the old dualism of extrinsic instruction versus intrinsic symmetry-breaking in cell biology.

Indexed as

Cell MovementChemotaxisMotion

Identifiers

PMID27196433
PMCPMC4873176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.