Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196289›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Prevalence and Characteristics of Interventional Trials Conducted Exclusively in Elderly Persons: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Registered Clinical Trials.

Florence T Bourgeois, Karen L Olson, Tony Tse, John P A Ioannidis, Kenneth D Mandl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Diuretics in Cardiovascular Disease: For How Long and at What Dose?Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Experience of Being Fall-Prone and Participating in Research: Fallers' Perspectives.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Florence T BourgeoisDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Karen L OlsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Tony TseNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
John P A IoannidisStanford Prevention Research Center, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Kenneth D MandlDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Funding

EXCLUSION OF OLDER PATIENTS IN CLINICAL DRUG TRIALSR21AG043715 · NIA · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI BOURGEOIS, FLORENCE, MANDL, KENNETH D. · 2013 to 2014
$494k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG043715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundElderly patients represent the greatest consumers of healthcare per capita but have historically been underrepresented in clinical trials. It is unknown how many trials are designed to focus exclusively on elderly patients.

objectiveTo define the prevalence of interventional trials that study exclusively elderly persons and describe the characteristics of these trials, including their distribution across conditions most prevalent in the elderly.

designAll interventional clinical trials enrolling exclusively elderly patients (≥65 years), conducted primarily in high-income countries, and initiated between 2006 and 2014, identified through ClincialTrials.gov. MAIN MEASURES: Trials were identified and characterized according to design features and disease categories studied. Across disease categories we examined the burden of disease in the elderly in high-income countries (measured in disability-adjusted life years [DALYs]) and compared to the number of trials conducted exclusively in the elderly.

resultsAmong 80,965 interventional trials, 1,112 (1.4%) focused on elderly patients. Diverse types of interventions were studied in these trials (medications 33%, behavioral interventions 18%, and dietary supplements 10%) and the majority was funded by non-profit organizations (81%). Studies tended to be small (median sample size 122 participants [IQR 58, 305]), single-center studies (67%). Only 43% of 126 disease categories affecting elderly persons were studied in trials focused on the elderly. Among these disease categories, there was a 5162-fold range in the ratio of DALYs per trial. Across 5 conditions where over 80% of DALYs are in the elderly, there were a total of only 117 trials done exclusively in the elderly.

conclusionsVery few and mostly small studies are conducted exclusively in elderly persons, even for conditions that affect almost exclusively the elderly.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAgedAge FactorsBiasClinical Trials as TopicFemaleHumansMalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID27196289
PMCPMC4873036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.