Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196261›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2016

Community-Based Assessment to Inform a Chlamydia Screening Program for Women in a Rural American Indian Community.

Lucy Smartlowit-Briggs, Cynthia Pearson, Patricia Whitefoot, Bianca N Altamirano, Michelle Womack, Marie Bastin, Julia C Dombrowski

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lucy Smartlowit-BriggsFrom the *Awatam Consulting, Yakima, WA; †Indigenous Wellness Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ‡Toppenish School District, Toppenish, WA; §Indian Health Services, Yakama Nation, Toppenish, WA; ¶Center for AIDS and STD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; ∥Public Health-Seattle & King County HIV/STD Program, Seattle, WA.
Cynthia Pearson
Patricia Whitefoot
Bianca N Altamirano
Michelle Womack
Marie Bastin
Julia C Dombrowski
Public Health – Seattle & King County · US

Funding

Tribal College and Universities Behavioral Wellness Project (TCU BeWell)P60MD006909 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WALTERS, KARINA LYNN · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
Training Program in HIV Prevention Research EthicsR25DA031608 · NIDA · FORDHAM UNIVERSITY · PI FISHER, CELIA B · 2011 to 2025
$4.9M
The ITZA Program: Indigenous HIV/AIDS Research Training 3 (IHART3) ProgramR25MH084565 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Teresa A Evans-Campbell, Michelle D Johnson-Jennings · 2009 to 2026
$3.7M
Cognitive Processing Intervention for HIV/STI and Substance Use among Native WomeR34DA034529 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PEARSON, CYNTHIA RENEE · 2012 to 2014
$645k
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA031608NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA034529NIMHD NIH HHS P60 MD006909NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH084565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRates of chlamydial infection in American Indian/Alaska Native women in the United States are approximately 4-fold those in non-Hispanic white women. We conducted a community-based survey of self-identified American Indian/Alaska Native women 14 to 25 years of age on a reservation in the Northwestern United States to inform a chlamydia screening strategy.

methodsThe anonymous survey assessed respondents' knowledge, perceptions, and preferences related to chlamydia screening, results receipt, and partner notification. We recruited women using respondent-driven sampling, school-based sampling, and direct recruitment through social media and fliers. Participants in schools completed the survey as a paper-based, self-administered survey. Other participants could complete the survey in person, by phone as an interviewer-administered survey, or online.

resultsWe recruited 162 participants, most in schools (n = 83; 51%) or by peer referral (n = 55; 34%). Only 1 woman completed the survey online. Thirty-one respondents (19%) reported a history of an unplanned first pregnancy, and 19 (12%) reported a history of a diagnosed sexually transmitted disease. Most women (n = 98; 63%) recognized the potential impact of Chlamydia trachomatis on fertility. The preferred site for chlamydia screening was the Indian Health Service Clinic (n = 114; 70%), but 79 women (41%) would accept a C. trachomatis test at a nonclinical testing site. Of the 56 women (35%) who would accept home testing, most preferred to get the test kit from a clinic.

conclusionsOur results suggest that Indian Health Service efforts to increase chlamydia screening in the clinic and through outreach may be more successful than promotion of home testing in this population.

Indexed as

Contact TracingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeMass ScreeningAdolescentAdultAlaska NativesChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFemaleHumansIndians, North AmericanPregnancyRural PopulationSexually Transmitted DiseasesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID27196261
PMCPMC5446671
OpenAlexW2407721089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.