Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196083›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Validation of Novel Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Progression by the Combination of Bioinformatics, Clinical and Functional Studies.

Saeid Alinezhad, Riina-Minna Väänänen, Jesse Mattsson, Yifeng Li, Terhi Tallgrén, Natalia Tong Ochoa, Anders Bjartell, Malin Åkerfelt, Pekka Taimen, Peter J Boström and 2 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Involvement ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. The L-type calcium channel CaV1.3: A potential target for cancer therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prostate cancer and therapeutic challenges.Journal of biological research (Thessalonike, Greece) · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Saeid AlinezhadDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-1610-4520
Riina-Minna VäänänenDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jesse MattssonDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Yifeng LiDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Terhi TallgrénDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Natalia Tong OchoaDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Anders BjartellDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Div. of Urological Cancers, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Malin ÅkerfeltTurku Centre for Biotechnology and Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Pekka TaimenDepartment of Pathology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Peter J BoströmDepartment of Urology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Kim PetterssonDepartment of Biotechnology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Matthias NeesTurku Centre for Biotechnology and Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification and validation of biomarkers for clinical applications remains an important issue for improving diagnostics and therapy in many diseases, including prostate cancer. Gene expression profiles are routinely applied to identify diagnostic and predictive biomarkers or novel targets for cancer. However, only few predictive markers identified in silico have also been validated for clinical, functional or mechanistic relevance in disease progression. In this study, we have used a broad, bioinformatics-based approach to identify such biomarkers across a spectrum of progression stages, including normal and tumor-adjacent, premalignant, primary and late stage lesions. Bioinformatics data mining combined with clinical validation of biomarkers by sensitive, quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), followed by functional evaluation of candidate genes in disease-relevant processes, such as cancer cell proliferation, motility and invasion. From 300 initial candidates, eight genes were selected for validation by several layers of data mining and filtering. For clinical validation, differential mRNA expression of selected genes was measured by qRT-PCR in 197 clinical prostate tissue samples including normal prostate, compared against histologically benign and cancerous tissues. Based on the qRT-PCR results, significantly different mRNA expression was confirmed in normal prostate versus malignant PCa samples (for all eight genes), but also in cancer-adjacent tissues, even in the absence of detectable cancer cells, thus pointing to the possibility of pronounced field effects in prostate lesions. For the validation of the functional properties of these genes, and to demonstrate their putative relevance for disease-relevant processes, siRNA knock-down studies were performed in both 2D and 3D organotypic cell culture models. Silencing of three genes (DLX1, PLA2G7 and RHOU) in the prostate cancer cell lines PC3 and VCaP by siRNA resulted in marked growth arrest and cytotoxicity, particularly in 3D organotypic cell culture conditions. In addition, silencing of PLA2G7, RHOU, ACSM1, LAMB1 and CACNA1D also resulted in reduced tumor cell invasion in PC3 organoid cultures. For PLA2G7 and RHOU, the effects of siRNA silencing on proliferation and cell-motility could also be confirmed in 2D monolayer cultures. In conclusion, DLX1 and RHOU showed the strongest potential as useful clinical biomarkers for PCa diagnosis, further validated by their functional roles in PCa progression. These candidates may be useful for more reliable identification of relapses or therapy failures prior to the recurrence local or distant metastases.

Indexed as

1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseAgedBiomarkers, TumorCalcium Channels, L-TypeCoenzyme A LigasesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHomeodomain ProteinsHumansLamininMaleMiddle AgedProstatic Neoplasmsrho GTP-Binding ProteinsRNA InterferenceTranscription Factors1-Alkyl-2-acetylglycerophosphocholine EsteraseACSM1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCACNA1D protein, humanCalcium Channels, L-TypeCoenzyme A LigasesDistal-less homeobox proteinsHomeodomain ProteinsLAMB1 protein, humanLamininPLA2G7 protein, humanrho GTP-Binding ProteinsRHOU protein, humanTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27196083
PMCPMC4873225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.