Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196050›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Cervical Cancer Histology, Staging and Survival before and after Implementation of Organised Cervical Screening Programme in Poland.

Andrzej Nowakowski, Marek Cybulski, Irmina Buda, Iwona Janosz, Katarzyna Olszak-Wąsik, Piotr Bodzek, Andrzej Śliwczyński, Zbigniew Teter, Anita Olejek, Włodzimierz Baranowski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrzej NowakowskiDepartment of Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Marek CybulskiDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Irmina BudaDepartment of Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Iwona JanoszDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland.
Katarzyna Olszak-WąsikDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland.
Piotr BodzekDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland.
Andrzej ŚliwczyńskiNational Health Fund, Central Office, Warsaw, Poland.
Zbigniew TeterNational Health Fund, Central Office, Warsaw, Poland.
Anita OlejekDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland.
Włodzimierz BaranowskiDepartment of Gynaecology and Oncological Gynaecology, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PLWojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PLMedical University of Lublin · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A population-based organised cervical cancer screening programme (OCCSP) was introduced in Poland in 2006. In this study we have aimed to analyse whether selected parameters related to invasive cervical cancer (ICC) of patients diagnosed in two distant gynaecological oncology centres changed after the first screening round of the programme run between 2006-2008. We have run a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 189 women diagnosed with ICC between 2002-2005 (directly before introduction of the programme) and 165 patients diagnosed between 2009-2012 (just after the first screening round of the programme) and compared their age at diagnosis, histology, stage of tumours and overall survival (OS). Mean age of patients diagnosed in years 2002-2005 and 2009-2012 was 52.1 and 52.6 years respectively. Squamous cell carcinomas constituted 90.5% and 86.1% of tumours diagnosed in years 2002-2005 and 2009-2012 respectively and the rest of tumours had glandular and other histologies. 74.5% and 61.0% of women diagnosed in years 2002-2005 and 2009-2012 respectively had early ICC (FIGO-International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics stages I-IIA) and the rest had advanced disease (FIGO IIB-IV). We have noticed no significant differences in mean age of patients, histology of tumours and OS of patients with ICC diagnosed before and after the first screening round of OCSSP in Poland. Advanced stages of ICC were more commonly diagnosed after the introduction of OCSSP. Changes only in some clinical parameters of patients with ICC were noticed before and after the first screening round of OCSSP in Poland but OS of patients remained the same.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellCross-Sectional StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMass ScreeningMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingPolandRetrospective StudiesUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID27196050
PMCPMC4873170
OpenAlexW2407949604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.