Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27196003›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2017

Disruption of Locomotion in Response to Hindlimb Muscle Stretch at Acute and Chronic Time Points after a Spinal Cord Injury in Rats.

Anastasia V P Keller, Grace Wainwright, Alice Shum-Siu, Daniella Prince, Alyssa Hoeper, Emily Martin, David S K Magnuson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anastasia V P Keller1 Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.
Grace Wainwright5 Department of J.B. Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.
Alice Shum-Siu1 Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.
Daniella Prince1 Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.
Alyssa Hoeper5 Department of J.B. Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.
Emily Martin5 Department of J.B. Speed School of Engineering, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.
David S K Magnuson1 Kentucky Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, University of Louisville , Louisville, Kentucky.

Funding

Signaling pathways in neuronal susceptibility to hypoxiaP20RR015576 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI HUBSCHER, CHARLES H. · 2000 to 2009
$18.5M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR015576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

After spinal cord injury (SCI) muscle contractures develop in the plegic limbs of many patients. Physical therapists commonly use stretching as an approach to avoid contractures and to maintain the extensibility of soft tissues. We found previously that a daily stretching protocol has a negative effect on locomotor recovery in rats with mild thoracic SCI. The purpose of the current study was to determine the effects of stretching on locomotor function at acute and chronic time points after moderately severe contusive SCI. Female Sprague-Dawley rats with 25 g-cm T10 contusion injuries received our standard 24-min stretching protocol starting 4 days (acutely) or 10 weeks (chronically) post-injury (5 days/week for 5 or 4 weeks, respectively). Locomotor function was assessed using the BBB (Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan) Open Field Locomotor Scale, video-based kinematics, and gait analysis. Locomotor deficits were evident in the acute animals after only 5 days of stretching and increasing the perceived intensity of stretching at week 4 resulted in greater impairment. Stretching initiated chronically resulted in dramatic decrements in locomotor function because most animals had BBB scores of 0-3 for weeks 2, 3, and 4 of stretching. Locomotor function recovered to control levels for both groups within 2 weeks once daily stretching ceased. Histological analysis revealed no apparent signs of overt and persistent damage to muscles undergoing stretching. The current study extends our observations of the stretching phenomenon to a more clinically relevant moderately severe SCI animal model. The results are in agreement with our previous findings and further demonstrate that spinal cord locomotor circuitry is especially vulnerable to the negative effects of stretching at chronic time points. While the clinical relevance of this phenomenon remains unknown, we speculate that stretching may contribute to the lack of locomotor recovery in some patients.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleGaitHindlimbLocomotionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyReflex, StretchSpinal Cord InjuriesTime Factorslocomotor functionrehabilitationspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID27196003
PMCPMC5286548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.