ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2016
Induction, labor length and mode of delivery: the impact on preeclampsia-related adverse maternal outcomes.
Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Hypertensive Disorders, Antihypertensive Therapy and Pregnancy Outcomes among Pregnant Women: A Retrospective Review of Cases at Tamale Teaching Hospital, Ghana.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Severe preterm preeclampsia: an examination of outcomes by race.American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM · 2020Article
- Adverse Maternal Outcomes Differ between Obese and Nonobese Women with Severe Preeclampsia.American journal of perinatology · 2019Article
- Factors associated with postpartum follow-up and persistent hypertension among women with severe preeclampsia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe objectives were to evaluate whether induction, specifically prolonged labor, was associated with adverse maternal outcomes related to preeclampsia with severe features (PEC-S) and whether cesarean affected the rate. STUDY
designThis was a retrospective cohort study of women with PEC-S ⩾34 weeks who were diagnosed either before planned cesarean or before induction/latent labor. The primary outcome was a composite adverse maternal outcome related to PEC-S.
resultsThe final cohort comprised 193 women (n=172 with labor and n=21 with planned cesarean). The prevalence of the outcome was 15.5%. Women exposed to labor did not have a higher rate compared with planned cesarean (16.3% vs 9.5%, P=0.4). Adjusting for confounders, women with a cesarean after prolonged labor had a 10-fold higher adverse outcome risk compared with women with a planned cesarean (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 9.7 (1.2 to 78.6), P=0.03) or with a vaginal delivery <24 h (aOR 9.7 (1.4 to 67.4), P=0.02).
conclusionProlonged labor and cesarean in labor were both associated with an increase in our outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.