Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27195912›Full record

ReviewCancer letters2017

Molecular imaging to guide systemic cancer therapy: Illustrative examples of PET imaging cancer biomarkers.

Austin R Pantel, David A Mankoff

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer letters, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  2. Clinical efficacy ofFrontiers in oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Recent advances in non-invasiveBiomaterials science · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Understanding the sources of errors inBiomedical optics express · 2021
    Article
  11. Imaging CAR T Cell Trafficking with eDHFR as a PET Reporter Gene.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Qualification of National Cancer Institute-Designated Cancer Centers for Quantitative PET/CT Imaging in Clinical Trials.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Austin R PantelDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 116 Donner Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA.
David A MankoffDepartment of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 116 Donner Building, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, USA. Electronic address: david.mankoff@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA CAN CTR SUPPORT GRANTP30CA016520 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SHELLEY L BERGER · 1985 to 2026
$222.3M
Advanced PET/CT Imaging for Improving Clinical TrialsU01CA148131 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KINAHAN, PAUL E., LINDEN, HANNAH M · 2010 to 2019
$6.0M
RESEARCH TRACK RADIOLOGY RESIDENCYT32EB004311 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Terence P Gade, Misun Hwang · 2005 to 2026
$4.5M
Molecular Imaging Markers for Glutaminolysis in Breast CancerR01CA211337 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI MANKOFF, DAVID A., ZHOU, RONG · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016520NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211337NCI NIH HHS U01 CA148131NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB004311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular imaging agents have the ability to non-invasively visualize, characterize, and quantify the molecular biology of disease. Recent advances in nuclear probe development, particularly in PET radiotracers, have generated many new imaging agents with precise molecular targets. With such specificity, PET probes may be utilized as biomarkers to objectively interrogate and evaluate pathology. Whereas the current indications for PET imaging are predominately confined to staging and restaging of malignancy, the utility of PET greatly expands when utilized as a biomarker, the topic of this review. As an imaging biomarker, PET may be used to (1) measure target expression to select subsets of patients who would most benefit from targeted therapy; (2) measure early treatment response to predict therapeutic efficacy; and (3) relate tumor response to survival. This review will discuss the application of radiotracers to targeted cancer therapy. Particular attention is given to new radiotracers evaluated in recently completed clinical trials and those with current or potential clinical utility. The diverse roles of PET in clinical trails for drug development are also examined.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMolecular ImagingNeoplasmsPositron-Emission TomographyRadioactive TracersRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedSurgery, Computer-AssistedRadioactive TracersCancer biomarkersClinical trialsPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID27195912
PMCPMC5839329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.