ArticleNeuroImage2016
Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part I: Nonparametric approaches to inter-subject correlation analysis at the group level.
Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed.
- Examining emotion reactivity to politically polarizing media in a randomized controlled trial of mindfulness training versus active coping training.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Dyadic Person Similarity Predicts Similarity in Face Judgements.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026Article
- Interpersonal Synchronization of Autonomic Physiology via Mere Visual Contact.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring Empathic Responses to Others' Positive and Negative Experiences: Insights from Empathy Subprocesses.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- The role of dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in dynamic attitude changes in naturalistic settings.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Reduced inter-subject functional connectivity during movies in autism: replicability across cross-national fMRI datasets.Molecular autism · 2026Article
- Conversational linguistic features inform social-relational inference.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Predicting whole-brain neural dynamics from prefrontal cortex functional near-infrared spectroscopy signal during movie-watching.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2025Article
- Dynamic brain connectivity predicts emotional arousal during naturalistic movie-watching.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Neural divergence between individuals with and without minor depression during dynamic emotion processing: a movie-fMRI Study.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Narrative predicts cardiac synchrony in audiences.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Deciphering the neural responses to a naturalistic persuasive message.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Auditory areas are recruited for naturalistic visual meaning in early deaf people.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Heroes and villains: opposing narrative roles engage neural synchronization in the inferior frontal gyrus.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2024Article
- Intracranial EEG signals disentangle multi-areal neural dynamics of vicarious pain perception.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Consensus-building conversation leads to neural alignment.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Intersubject representational similarity analysis uncovers the impact of state anxiety on brain activation patterns in the human extrastriate cortex.Brain imaging and behavior · 2024Article
- Managing emotions in the age of political polarization: A randomized controlled trial comparing mindfulness to cognitive reappraisal.Research square · 2024Article
- Individuals who see the good in the bad engage distinctive default network coordination during post-encoding rest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Synchronized affect in shared experiences strengthens social connection.Communications biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
FMRI data acquisition under naturalistic and continuous stimuli (e.g., watching a video or listening to music) has become popular recently due to the fact that it entails less manipulation and more realistic/complex contexts involved in the task, compared to the conventional task-based experimental designs. The synchronization or response similarities among subjects are typically measured through inter-subject correlation (ISC) between any pair of subjects. At the group level, summarizing the collection of ISC values is complicated by their intercorrelations, which necessarily lead to the violation of independence assumed in typical parametric approaches such as Student's t-test. Nonparametric methods, such as bootstrapping and permutation testing, have previously been adopted for testing purposes by resampling the time series of each subject, but the quantitative validity of these specific approaches in terms of controllability of false positive rate (FPR) has never been explored before. Here we survey the methods of ISC group analysis that have been employed in the literature, and discuss the issues involved in those methods. We then propose less computationally intensive nonparametric methods that can be performed at the group level (for both one- and two-sample analyses), as compared to the popular method of circularly shifting the EPI time series at the individual level. As part of the new approaches, subject-wise (SW) resampling is adopted instead of element-wise (EW) resampling, so that exchangeability and independence assumptions are satisfied, and the patterned correlation structure among the ISC values can be more accurately captured. We examine the FPR controllability and power achievement of all the methods through simulations, as well as their performance when applied to a real experimental dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.