Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27195792›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2016

Untangling the relatedness among correlations, part I: Nonparametric approaches to inter-subject correlation analysis at the group level.

Gang Chen, Yong-Wook Shin, Paul A Taylor, Daniel R Glen, Richard C Reynolds, Robert B Israel, Robert W Cox

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Dyadic Person Similarity Predicts Similarity in Face Judgements.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Deciphering the neural responses to a naturalistic persuasive message.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Individuals who see the good in the bad engage distinctive default network coordination during post-encoding rest.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gang ChenScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA. Electronic address: gangchen@mail.nih.gov.
Yong-Wook ShinUniversity of Ulsan College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, South Korea. Electronic address: shaman_korea@mac.com.
Paul A TaylorScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.
Daniel R GlenScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.
Richard C ReynoldsScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.
Robert B IsraelMathematics Department, The University of British Columbia, Canada.
Robert W CoxScientific and Statistical Computing Core, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, USA.

Funding

Scientific and Statistical Computing CoreZICMH002888 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI TAYLOR, PAUL · 2009 to 2025
$30.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIC MH002888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

FMRI data acquisition under naturalistic and continuous stimuli (e.g., watching a video or listening to music) has become popular recently due to the fact that it entails less manipulation and more realistic/complex contexts involved in the task, compared to the conventional task-based experimental designs. The synchronization or response similarities among subjects are typically measured through inter-subject correlation (ISC) between any pair of subjects. At the group level, summarizing the collection of ISC values is complicated by their intercorrelations, which necessarily lead to the violation of independence assumed in typical parametric approaches such as Student's t-test. Nonparametric methods, such as bootstrapping and permutation testing, have previously been adopted for testing purposes by resampling the time series of each subject, but the quantitative validity of these specific approaches in terms of controllability of false positive rate (FPR) has never been explored before. Here we survey the methods of ISC group analysis that have been employed in the literature, and discuss the issues involved in those methods. We then propose less computationally intensive nonparametric methods that can be performed at the group level (for both one- and two-sample analyses), as compared to the popular method of circularly shifting the EPI time series at the individual level. As part of the new approaches, subject-wise (SW) resampling is adopted instead of element-wise (EW) resampling, so that exchangeability and independence assumptions are satisfied, and the patterned correlation structure among the ISC values can be more accurately captured. We examine the FPR controllability and power achievement of all the methods through simulations, as well as their performance when applied to a real experimental dataset.

Indexed as

Data Interpretation, StatisticalModels, StatisticalStatistics, NonparametricBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID27195792
PMCPMC5114176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.