Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27195526›Full record

ReviewJournal of healthcare engineering2016

Challenges of Identifying Clinically Actionable Genetic Variants for Precision Medicine.

Tonia C Carter, Max M He

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. SPDI: data model for variants and applications at NCBI.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The Landscape of Actionable Gene Fusions in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Big Data Analytics for Genomic Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tonia C CarterCenter for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.
Max M HeCenter for Human Genetics, Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation, Marshfield, WI 54449, USA.

Funding

Institutional Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000427 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI DREZNER, MARC KENNETH · 2012 to 2016
$32.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in genomic medicine have the potential to change the way we treat human disease, but translating these advances into reality for improving healthcare outcomes depends essentially on our ability to discover disease- and/or drug-associated clinically actionable genetic mutations. Integration and manipulation of diverse genomic data and comprehensive electronic health records (EHRs) on a big data infrastructure can provide an efficient and effective way to identify clinically actionable genetic variants for personalized treatments and reduce healthcare costs. We review bioinformatics processing of next-generation sequencing (NGS) data, bioinformatics infrastructures for implementing precision medicine, and bioinformatics approaches for identifying clinically actionable genetic variants using high-throughput NGS data and EHRs.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPrecision MedicineComputational BiologyGenome, HumanHumansMedical InformaticsMolecular Targeted Therapy

Identifiers

PMID27195526
PMCPMC4955563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.