Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27195278›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2016

Lung cancer screening in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Jessica Gonzalez, Marta Marín, Pablo Sánchez-Salcedo, Javier J Zulueta

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. PrPEnvironmental science & technology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current Evidence for a Lung Cancer Screening Program.Portuguese journal of public health · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. ERS/ESTS/ESTRO/ESR/ESTI/EFOMP statement on management of incidental findings from low dose CT screening for lung cancer.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Modern pulmonary imaging of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica Gonzalez1 Respiratory Medicine Service, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain ; 2 Respiratory Medicine Service, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Marta Marín1 Respiratory Medicine Service, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain ; 2 Respiratory Medicine Service, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Pablo Sánchez-Salcedo1 Respiratory Medicine Service, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain ; 2 Respiratory Medicine Service, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier J Zulueta1 Respiratory Medicine Service, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain ; 2 Respiratory Medicine Service, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Clinica Universidad de Navarra · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are two intimately related diseases, with great impact on public health. Annual screening using low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) of the chest significantly reduces mortality due to lung cancer, and several scientific societies now recommend this technique. COPD, defined by the presence of airflow obstruction [forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio less than 0.70], and their clinical phenotypes, namely emphysema and chronic bronchitis, have been associated with increased lung cancer risk. Several epidemiological studies, including lung cancer screening trials, have found a 2- to 4-fold increase in lung cancer risk in patients with COPD when compared to individuals without airflow obstruction. Part of the risk attributed to airflow obstruction appears to be derived from the presence of radiographic emphysema. The latter has proven to be an important lung cancer risk factor in smokers without airflow obstruction and even in never smokers. This evidence supports the idea of including patients with COPD and/or emphysema in lung cancer screening programs. There is evidence that lung cancer screening in this population is effective and can potentially reduce mortality. Specific lung cancer risk scores have been developed for patients with COPD [COPD lung cancer screening score (LUCSS) and COPD-LUCSS-diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO)] to identify those at high risk. A multidisciplinary approach for an adequate patient selection, especially of patients with severe disease, is key to maximize benefits and reduce harms from lung cancer screening in this population. Patients with COPD included in lung cancer screening programs could also benefit from other interventions, such as smoking cessation and adequate treatment.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)emphysemalung cancerLung cancer screening

Identifiers

PMID27195278
PMCPMC4860483
OpenAlexW2344176177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.