Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27195275›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2016

Smoking cessation and lung cancer screening.

Jesper Holst Pedersen, Philip Tønnesen, Haseem Ashraf

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Recommendations from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) regarding computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Europe.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2017
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Impact of Low-Dose Computed Tomography Findings on Cigarette Smoking Cessation Among High-Risk Adults Participating in Lung Cancer Screening.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Observational
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Attitudes towards the integration of smoking cessation into lung cancer screening in the United Kingdom: A qualitative study of individuals eligible to attend.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lung cancer screening: targeting the hard to reach-a review.Translational lung cancer research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Smoking cessation behaviors among older U.S. adults.Preventive medicine reports · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jesper Holst Pedersen1 Department of Thoracic Surgery RT, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 3 Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Philip Tønnesen1 Department of Thoracic Surgery RT, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 3 Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Haseem Ashraf1 Department of Thoracic Surgery RT, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark ; 2 Department of Respiratory Medicine, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark ; 3 Department of Radiology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Gentofte Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smoking behavior may have a substantial influence on the overall effect of lung cancer screening. Non-randomized studies of smoking behavior during screening have indicated that computer tomography (CT) screening induces smoking cessation. Randomized studies have further elaborated that this effect has to do with participation in screening alone and not dependent on the CT scan. Participants in both CT and control arm in randomized screening trials had higher smoking abstinence rate compared to that of the general population. A positive screening test seems to further promote smoking cessation and decrease smoking relapse rate. Also low smoking dependency and high motivation to quit smoking at baseline predicted smoking abstinence in screening trials. Lung cancer screening therefore seems to be a teachable moment for smoking cessation. Targeted smoking cessation counselling should be an integrated part of future lung cancer screening trials.

Indexed as

computer tomography (CT) scanningLung cancer screeningpositive findingsreviewsmokingsmoking cessation

Identifiers

PMID27195275
PMCPMC4860486
OpenAlexW2344432381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.