Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27195136›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2016

European perspective in Thoracic surgery-eso-coloplasty: when and how?

Lucile Gust, Moussa Ouattara, Willy Coosemans, Philippe Nafteux, Pascal Alexandre Thomas, Xavier Benoit D'Journo

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucile Gust1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France ; 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Gasthuisberg KUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Moussa Ouattara1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France ; 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Gasthuisberg KUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Willy Coosemans1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France ; 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Gasthuisberg KUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Philippe Nafteux1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France ; 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Gasthuisberg KUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Pascal Alexandre Thomas1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France ; 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Gasthuisberg KUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Xavier Benoit D'Journo1 Department of Thoracic Surgery, North Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France ; 2 Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Campus Gasthuisberg KUZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRUniversitair Ziekenhuis Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colon interposition has been used since the beginning of the 20(th) century as a substitute for esophageal replacement. Colon interposition is mainly chosen as a second line treatment when the stomach cannot be used, when the stomach has to be resected for oncological or technical reasons, or when the stomach is deliberately kept intact for benign diseases in young patients with long-life expectancy. During the surgery the vascularization of the colon must be carefully assessed, as well as the type of the graft (right or left colon), the length of the graft, the surgical approach and the route of the reconstruction. Early complications such as graft necrosis or anastomotic leaks, and late complications such as redundancy depend on the quality of the initial surgery. Despite a complex and time-consuming procedure requiring at least three or four digestive anastomoses, reported long term functional outcomes of colon interposition are good, with an acceptable operative risk. Thus, in very selected indications, colon interposition could be seen as a valuable alternative for esophageal replacement when stomach cannot be considered. This review aims at briefly defining "when" and "how" to perform a coloplasty through demonstrative videos.

Indexed as

benign esophageal diseasecolon interpositionesophageal canceresophageal motility dysfunctionEsophageal surgery

Identifiers

PMID27195136
PMCPMC4856848
OpenAlexW2343585847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.