Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27194944›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2016

Partial Müllerian Duct Retention in Smad4 Conditional Mutant Male Mice.

Fabrice G Petit, Chuxia Deng, Soazik P Jamin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  6. The role of TGF-β/SMAD4 signaling in cancer.International journal of biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  7. TGFβ superfamily signaling and uterine decidualization.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2017
    Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabrice G Petit1. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail, UMR1085, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France;; 2. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U782, Clamart, France.
Chuxia Deng3. Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Macau, Macau SAR, China.
Soazik P Jamin1. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail, UMR1085, Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France;; 2. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U782, Clamart, France.
Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail · FRUniversity of Macau · MO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Müllerian duct regression is a complex process which involves the AMH signalling pathway. We have previously demonstrated that besides AMH and its specific type II receptor (AMHRII), BMPR-IA and Smad5 are two essential factors implicated in this mechanism. Mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (Smad4) is a transcription factor and the common Smad (co-Smad) involved in transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signalling pathway superfamily. Since Smad4 null mutants die early during gastrulation, we have inactivated Smad4 in the Müllerian duct mesenchyme. Specific inactivation of Smad4 in the urogenital ridge leads to the partial persistence of the Müllerian duct in adult male mice. Careful examination of the urogenital tract reveals that the Müllerian duct retention is randomly distributed either on one side or both sides. Histological analysis shows a uterus-like structure, which is confirmed by the expression of estrogen receptor α. As previously described in a β-catenin conditional mutant mouse model, β-catenin contributes to Müllerian duct regression. In our mutant male embryos, it appears that β-catenin expression is locally reduced along the urogenital ridge as compared to control mice. Moreover, the expression pattern is similar to those observed in control female mice. This study shows that reduced Smad4 expression disrupts the Wnt/β-catenin signalling leading to the partial persistence of Müllerian duct.

Indexed as

Animalsbeta CateninBone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors, Type IEstrogen Receptor alphaExonsFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalImmunohistochemistryMaleMiceMice, KnockoutMice, Mutant StrainsMullerian DuctsSignal TransductionSmad4 Proteinbeta CateninBmpr1a protein, mouseBone Morphogenetic Protein Receptors, Type IEstrogen Receptor alphaSmad4 ProteinSmad5 ProteinSMAD5 protein, humanconditional knockoutMüllerian ductSmad4β-catenin.

Identifiers

PMID27194944
PMCPMC4870710
OpenAlexW2413865159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.