Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27194796›Full record

ArticleLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2016

Motivational state, reward value, and Pavlovian cues differentially affect skilled forelimb grasping in rats.

Alice C Mosberger, Larissa de Clauser, Hansjörg Kasper, Martin E Schwab

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Consensus Paper: Cerebellum and Reward.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alice C MosbergerBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland mosberger@hifo.uzh.ch.
Larissa de ClauserBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Hansjörg KasperBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Martin E SchwabBrain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

European Research Council 294115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor skills represent high-precision movements performed at optimal speed and accuracy. Such motor skills are learned with practice over time. Besides practice, effects of motivation have also been shown to influence speed and accuracy of movements, suggesting that fast movements are performed to maximize gained reward over time as noted in previous studies. In rodents, skilled motor performance has been successfully modeled with the skilled grasping task, in which animals use their forepaw to grasp for sugar pellet rewards through a narrow window. Using sugar pellets, the skilled grasping task is inherently tied to motivation processes. In the present study, we performed three experiments modulating animals' motivation during skilled grasping by changing the motivational state, presenting different reward value ratios, and displaying Pavlovian stimuli. We found in all three studies that motivation affected the speed of skilled grasping movements, with the strongest effects seen due to motivational state and reward value. Furthermore, accuracy of the movement, measured in success rate, showed a strong dependence on motivational state as well. Pavlovian cues had only minor effects on skilled grasping, but results indicate an inverse Pavlovian-instrumental transfer effect on movement speed. These findings have broad implications considering the increasing use of skilled grasping in studies of motor system structure, function, and recovery after injuries.

Indexed as

CuesMotivationMotor SkillsRewardAnimalsBehavior, AnimalConditioning, ClassicalFemaleHand StrengthRats, Long-Evans

Identifiers

PMID27194796
PMCPMC4880147
OpenAlexW2399259488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.