ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Comparison of anti-anginal effect of cilnidipine with those of nicardipine and nifedipine in the vasopressin-induced angina model of rats.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- APOM-associated inflammation and apoptosis in stroke-exacerbated myocardial infarction: implications for brain-heart interactions.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We assessed the anti-anginal effects of cilnidipine in comparison with those of nicardipine and nifedipine (1 and 10 µg/kg, n = 6 for each drug) or vehicle (n = 6) by using the vasopressin-induced angina model of rats. The administration of vasopressin (0.5 IU/kg, i.v.) to the rats depressed the S-wave level of the electrocardiogram reflecting the presence of subendocardial ischemia, whereas it significantly increased the mean blood pressure, resulting in the decrease of the heart rate and the prolongation of the PR interval possibly through a reflex-mediated increase in vagal tone. Cilnidipine suppressed the vasopressin-induced depression of the S-wave level in a dose-related manner, which was not observed by nicardipine or nifedipine. In addition, the low dose of cilnidipine hardly affected the vasopressin-induced pressor response, but it attenuated the negative dromotropic effect, suggesting N-type Ca
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.