Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27194258›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017

Consistency of patient-reported outcomes after cholecystectomy and their implications on current surgical practice: a prospective multicenter cohort study.

Sarah Wennmacker, Mark Lamberts, Jos Gerritsen, Jan Anne Roukema, Gert Westert, Joost Drenth, Cornelis van Laarhoven

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Patient reported outcomes in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah WennmackerDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. sarah.wennmacker@radboudumc.nl.
Mark LambertsDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jos GerritsenDepartment of Surgery, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jan Anne RoukemaDepartment of Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Gert WestertScientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ Healthcare), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Joost DrenthDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Cornelis van LaarhovenDepartment of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NLElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NLMedisch Spectrum Twente · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent postoperative pain (up to 41 %) and significant practice variation necessitate better patient selection for cholecystectomy. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are nowadays known to serve as a tool for better patient selection, although variability within these subjective outcomes may be a point for debate. This study determines associations of both the preoperative pain and patient characteristics with PROMs at 24 weeks after cholecystectomy. In order to evaluate variability of PROMs, we also determined consistency of these outcomes in time.

methodsThis prospective multicenter cohort study included adult patients diagnosed with uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Twenty-four weeks after surgery, a questionnaire study was carried out, containing Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and Patients' Experience of Surgery Questionnaire. Results were compared to preoperative data and results 12 weeks post-cholecystectomy. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine associations. Additional post hoc analysis on associations between preoperative selection criteria and PROMs was done.

resultsA total of 360 patients (85 %) responded. Postoperative absence of pain was reported by 59.2 %. Associated characteristics were symptoms ≤1 year prior to surgery [OR 1.85 (95 % CI 1.11-3.09)] and high baseline GIQLI score [OR 1.04 (95 % CI 1.02-1.05)]. General improvement in abdominal symptoms and positive result of surgery were found in 90 %; no preoperative variables were significantly associated. PROMs showed consistency at 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively. Post hoc analysis showed no significant associations.

conclusionPROM-based preoperative selection criteria need to be considered to select those patients who achieve freedom of pain after surgical treatment of uncomplicated symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. Other patients might consider cholecystectomy as successful, but are less likely to be free of pain. Usefulness of PROMs is underscored as they proved to be consistent in time in evaluating surgical outcome.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAbdominal PainAdultCholecystolithiasisCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesCholecystectomyCholecystolithiasisGallstonesPatient-reported outcomesSelection criteria

Identifiers

PMID27194258
PMCPMC5216116
OpenAlexW2406837404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.