Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27194195›Full record

SynthesisJournal of opioid management

State-level and system-level opioid prescribing policies: The impact on provider practices and overdose deaths, a systematic review.

Francesca L Beaudoin, Geetanjoli N Banerjee, Michael J Mello

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of opioid management. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Commercial and public payer opioid analgesic prescribing policies: a case study.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Quality improvement initiative for pain management practices in primary care.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2020
    Article
  14. The state of the science in opioid policy research.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca L BeaudoinAssistant Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Geetanjoli N BanerjeeDepartment of Epidemiology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.
Michael J MelloProfessor, Departments of Emergency Medicine and Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.

Funding

The Brown Initiative in HIV and AIDS Clinical Research for Minority CommunitiesR25MH083620 · NIMH · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI NUNN, AMY STEWART · 2008 to 2025
$3.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH083620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn response to persistent public health concerns regarding prescription opioids, many states and healthcare systems have implemented legislation and policies intended to regulate or guide opioid prescribing. The overall impact of these policies is still uncertain. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the existing evidence of provider-level and patient-level outcomes preimplementation and postimplementation of policies and legislation constructed to impact provider prescribing practices around opioid analgesics.

designA systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews was conducted to identify studies evaluating the impact of opioid prescribing policies on provider-level and patient-level outcomes. The systematic review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

resultsEleven studies were included in the review. A meta-analysis was not possible due to between-study heterogeneity. Six of the studies assessed state-level policies, and five were at the level of the healthcare system or hospital. Studies showed temporal associations between policy implementation and reductions in opioid prescribing, as well as opioid-related overdoses. Results were mixed regarding the impact of policies on misuse. The majority of the studies were judged to be of low quality based on the GRADE criteria.

conclusionsThere is low to moderate quality evidence suggesting that the presence of opioid prescribing policy will reduce the amount and strength of opioid prescribed. The presence of these policies may impact the number of overdoses, but there is no clear evidence to suggest that it reduces opioid misuse.

Indexed as

Health PolicyState GovernmentAnalgesics, OpioidCause of DeathDrug OverdoseDrug PrescriptionsHumansInappropriate PrescribingModels, OrganizationalOpioid-Related DisordersPatient SafetyPolicy MakingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription Drug MisuseRegional Health PlanningRisk AssessmentAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID27194195
PMCPMC9897022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.