Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27194068›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Mucosal adherent bacterial dysbiosis in patients with colorectal adenomas.

Yingying Lu, Jing Chen, Junyuan Zheng, Guoyong Hu, Jingjing Wang, Chunlan Huang, Lihong Lou, Xingpeng Wang, Yue Zeng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exploring the Complex Relationship between Gut Microbiota and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasia Using Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yingying LuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Jing ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Junyuan ZhengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Guoyong HuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Jingjing WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Chunlan HuangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Lihong LouInternational Medical Care Center, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Xingpeng WangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.
Yue ZengDepartment of Gastroenterology, Shanghai general Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200080, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent reports have suggested that the gut microbiota is involved in the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). The composition of gut microbiota in CRC precursors has not been adequately described. To characterize the structure of adherent microbiota in this disease, we conducted pyrosequencing-based analysis of 16S rRNA genes to determine the bacterial profile of normal colons (healthy controls) and colorectal adenomas (CRC precursors). Adenoma mucosal biopsy samples and adjacent normal colonic mucosa from 31 patients with adenomas and 20 healthy volunteers were profiled using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed structural segregation between colorectal adenomatous tissue and control tissue. Alpha diversity estimations revealed higher microbiota diversity in samples from patients with adenomas. Taxonomic analysis illustrated that abundance of eight phyla (Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Candidate-division TM7, and Tenericutes) was significantly different. In addition, Lactococcus and Pseudomonas were enriched in preneoplastic tissue, whereas Enterococcus, Bacillus, and Solibacillus were reduced. However, both PCoA and cluster tree analyses showed similar microbiota structure between adenomatous and adjacent non-adenoma tissues. These present findings provide preliminary experimental evidence supporting that colorectal preneoplastic lesion may be the most important factor leading to alterations in bacterial community composition.

Indexed as

AdenomaAdultAgedBacteriaBacterial AdhesionBiopsyColonDysbiosisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhylogenyPretectal RegionRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID27194068
PMCPMC4872055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.