Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27194043›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2016

Ketamine for Treatment of Suicidal Ideation and Reduction of Risk for Suicidal Behavior.

Faryal Mallick, Cheryl B McCullumsmith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A feasibility study of low-dose ketamine for acute management of suicidal ideation.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2022
    Article
  5. A Review of Nonanesthetic Uses of Ketamine.Anesthesiology research and practice · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faryal MallickDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Cheryl B McCullumsmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. cheryl.mccullumsmith@uc.edu.
University of Cincinnati · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ketamine, an NMDA receptor antagonist with efficacy as a rapid anti-depressant, has early evidence for action to reduce suicidal ideation. This review will explore several important questions that arise from these studies. First, how do we measure reductions in suicidal ideation that occur over minutes to hours? Second, are the reductions in suicidal ideation after ketamine treatment solely a result of its rapid anti-depressant effect? Third, is ketamine only effective in reducing suicidal ideation in patients with mood disorders? Fourth, could ketamine's action lead us to a greater understanding of the neurobiology of suicidal processes? Last, do the reductions in depression and suicidal ideation after ketamine treatment translate into decreased risk for suicidal behavior? Our review concludes that ketamine treatment can be seen as a double-edged sword, clinically to help provide treatment for acutely suicidal patients and experimentally to explore the neurobiological nature of suicidal ideation and suicidal behavior.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationSuicide PreventionDepressionDepressive DisorderHumansKetamineMood DisordersReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSuicide, AttemptedKetamineReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateDepressionKetamineMood disordersRDoC domainsSuicidal attemptSuicidal IdeationSuicidal Ideation Assessment Scales

Identifiers

PMID27194043
OpenAlexW2407351441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.