Observational studyUpdates in surgery2016
Disposable bipolar irrigated sealer (Aquamantys(®)) for liver resection: use with caution.
Observational study in Updates in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strangulated necrotic gastric fundus due to diaphragmatic hernia presenting with hydropneumothorax 5 years after left hepatic lobectomy: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Hemostasis in a giant intraventricular tumor using a saline-cooled radiofrequency bipolar coagulator: technical note.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Incarcerated diaphragmatic hernia after right hepatectomy: an autopsy case with a review of 45 previous cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Review
- Assessment of the effect of the AquamantysClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2019Article
- Diaphragmatic hernia following liver resection: case series and review of the literature.Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The disposable bipolar irrigated sealer has been demonstrated to reduce perioperative bleeding, but its role in preventing postoperative cut-surface complications has not been evaluated to date. A prospective observational study was performed between January and September 2013 to evaluate a disposable bipolar irrigated sealed (Aquamantys(®)) on a continuous series of 51 first liver resections without biliary reconstruction. Primary end-point was the occurrence of cut-surface complications during the postoperative period. Secondary endpoints were postoperative complications and the 1-year overall survival rate. The results were compared to a propensity score matched group of 153 liver resections performed with conventional monopolar cautery. A cut-surface complication occurred in 13/51 (25.5 %) resected patients. Bleeding, bile leakage and subphrenic abscess occurred in 7.8, 11.8 and 11.8 % patients, respectively. Compared to the matched group, the resected group had a higher rate of cut-surface complications (25.5 vs. 14.7 %, p < 0.01) and a higher rate of Clavien-Dindo type ≥3 postoperative complications (29.5 vs. 17.2 %, p < 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.03, 95 % CI 1.09-5.9, OR 2.53), blood transfusion (p = 0.02, 95 % CI 1.78-6.55, OR 2.78) and Aquamantys(®) use (p = 0.02, 95 % CI 1.21-6.7, OR 2.85) were independent of cut-surface complications within the first 90 postoperative days. The overall 1-year survival rates were not different between the two groups (p = 0.078). Aquamantys(®) use is associated with an increased rate of postoperative complications compared to classical monopolar cautery, and we recommend that it should be used with caution in this type of surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.