Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193758›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

First detection of Onchocerca lupi infection in dogs in southern Spain.

Guadalupe Miró, Ana Montoya, Rocío Checa, Rosa Gálvez, Juan José Mínguez, Valentina Marino, Domenico Otranto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Zoonotic Ocular Onchocercosis byThe Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. First report ofParasitology · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Zoonotic Implications ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guadalupe MiróDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. gmiro@ucm.es.
Ana MontoyaDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rocío ChecaDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Rosa GálvezDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Juan José MínguezHospital Veterinario Guadiamar, Sevilla, Spain.
Valentina MarinoDepartment of Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Domenico OtrantoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOnchocerca lupi causes ocular pathology of varying severity in dogs from south-western United States, western Europe and northern Asia. This filarioid has also been recognized as a zoonotic agent in Tunisia, Turkey, Iran and the USA, though the information about the biology and epidemiology of this infection is largely unknown. In Europe, O. lupi has been reported in dogs from Germany, Greece, Hungary, Portugal and Romania and in a cat from Portugal. The present study was designed to establish the occurrence of O. lupi in dogs in southwestern Spain. In the present study a total of 104 dogs of different breed, sex, and age living in a shelter in Huelva (SW Spain) were examined. Skin snip samples were collected using a disposable scalpel in the forehead and inter-scapular regions and stored as aliquots in saline solution (0.5 ml) before light microscopy observation of individual sediments (20 μl) and molecular examination.

resultsOf the 104 dogs examined, 5 (4.8 %) were skin snip-positive for O. lupi: two by microscopy and three by PCR. One of the O. lupi infected dogs showed neurological signs but ocular ultrasonography and/or MRI detected no abnormalities.

conclusionsThis first report of O. lupi infection in dogs in southern Spain expands the range of geographical distribution of this parasite and sounds an alarm bell for practitioners and physicians working in that area.

Indexed as

AnimalsDog DiseasesDogsEyeFemaleMaleOnchocercaOnchocerciasis, OcularSkinSpainDogOnchocerca lupiSpainVector borne diseaseZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID27193758
PMCPMC4872350
OpenAlexW2405651785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.