ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2016
The effectiveness and safety of two prophylactic antibiotic regimes in hip-fracture surgery.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk of antimicrobial-associated organ injury among the older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2021Pooled it
- Adverse effects of a single dose of gentamicin in adults: a systematic review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2018Pooled it
- Trial
- Antibiotic prophylaxis as a quality of care indicator: does it help in the fight against surgical site infections following fragility hip fractures?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Surgical site infection after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in the UK.Bone & joint research · 2020Article
- Combination probiotics may preventBioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefuroxime can reduce the incidence of deep wound infection (DWI) in hip-fracture surgery, but may increase the risk of C. difficile infection (CDI). An alternative is gentamicin with beta-lactam for which a question exists around clinical effectiveness and safety, given the gentamicin-associated nephrotoxicity particularly in the elderly and narrower sensitivity spectrum. We compared 744 consecutive patients (group I-cefuroxime) with 756 in group II (gentamicin + flucloxacillin) who were well matched. There were 4 cases of CDI in the cefuroxime prophylaxis, whereas none in flucloxacillin plus gentamicin (group II). There was a statistically significant (p = 0.036) increased DWI rate in group II (2.5 %) as compared to group I (1.1 %). However, after controlling for age, gender, ASA grade, surgeon grade, implant type and type of anaesthesia, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.146). 8.5 % of group I and 16.5 % of group II developed AKI post-operatively (p = 0.023); however, 79 % of group I and 80 % of in group II had complete resolution of AKI prior to their discharge. Further, a significant increase in inpatient deaths (p = 0.057) in group II was observed, but not at 30 days (p = 0.378).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.