Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193745›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2016

Cost-effectiveness of Injectable Preexposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention in South Africa.

Robert L Glaubius, Greg Hood, Kerri J Penrose, Urvi M Parikh, John W Mellors, Eran Bendavid, Ume L Abbas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Robert L GlaubiusDepartments of Infectious Disease and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio.
Greg HoodPittsburgh Supercomputing Center, Carnegie Mellon University.
Kerri J PenroseDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Urvi M ParikhDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
John W MellorsDivision of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Eran BendavidDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, California.
Ume L AbbasDepartments of Infectious Disease and Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio Departments of Medicine and Molecular Virology and Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
University of Pittsburgh · USCleveland Clinic · USPittsburgh Supercomputing Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR01DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI OWENS, DOUGLAS K · 2002 to 2017
$9.4M
Making Better Decisions: Policy Modeling for AIDS and Drug AbuseR37DA015612 · NIDA · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS K OWENS · 2019 to 2026
$6.3M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA015612NIDA NIH HHS R37 DA015612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-acting injectable antiretrovirals such as rilpivirine (RPV) could promote adherence to preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention. However, the cost-effectiveness of injectable PrEP is unclear.

methodsWe constructed a dynamic model of the heterosexual HIV epidemic in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, and analyzed scenarios of RPV PrEP scale-up for combination HIV prevention in comparison with a reference scenario without PrEP. We estimated new HIV infections, life-years and costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), over 10-year and lifetime horizons, assuming a societal perspective.

resultsCompared with no PrEP, unprioritized scale-up of RVP PrEP covering 2.5%-15% of adults prevented up to 9% of new infections over 10 years. HIV prevention doubled (17%) when the same coverage was prioritized to 20- to 29-year-old women, costing $10 880-$19 213 per infection prevented. Prioritization of PrEP to 80% of individuals at highest behavioral risk achieved comparable prevention (4%-8%) at <1% overall coverage, costing $298-$1242 per infection prevented. Over lifetime, PrEP scale-up among 20- to 29-year-old women was very cost-effective (<$1600 per life-year gained), dominating unprioritized PrEP, while risk prioritization was cost-saving. PrEP's 10-year impact decreased by almost 50% with increases in ICERs (up to 4.2-fold) in conservative base-case analysis. Sensitivity analysis identified PrEP's costs, efficacy, and reliability of delivery as the principal drivers of uncertainty in PrEP's cost-effectiveness, and PrEP remained cost-effective under the assumption of universal access to second-line antiretroviral therapy.

conclusionsCompared with no PrEP, prioritized scale-up of RPV PrEP in KwaZulu-Natal could be very cost-effective or cost-saving, but suboptimal PrEP would erode benefits and increase costs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisEpidemicsFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInjectionsMaleMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalPre-Exposure ProphylaxisReproducibility of ResultsRilpivirineSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsRilpivirinecost-effectivenessHIV infectionHIV prevention interventionmathematical modelpreexposure prophylaxis (PrEP)

Identifiers

PMID27193745
PMCPMC4967601
OpenAlexW2395411176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.