Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193602›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2016

Bending the Cost Curve in Childhood Cancer.

Heidi Russell, M Brooke Bernhardt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. "It was time I could have spent better"-the barriers, enablers, and recommendations for improving access to financial aid when a child has cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  3. Medical Cost of Cancer Care for Privately Insured Children in Chile.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A systematic scoping review of the recent literature (∼2011-2017) about the costs of illness to parents of children diagnosed with cancer.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Heidi RussellTexas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Baylor College of Medicine, 6701 Fannin St, Suite 1580.00, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. hvrussel@txch.org.
M Brooke BernhardtDepartment of Pharmacy, Texas Children's Hospital, 6621 Fannin St, WB1-120, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare for children with cancer costs significantly more than other children. Cost reduction efforts aimed toward relatively small populations of patients that use a disproportionate amount of care, like childhood cancer, could have a dramatic impact on healthcare spending. The aims of this review are to provide stakeholders with an overview of the drivers of financial costs of childhood cancer and to identify possible directions to curb or decrease these costs. Costs are incurred throughout the spectrum of care. Recent trends in pharmaceutical costs, evidence identifying the contribution of administration costs, and overuse of surveillance studies are described. Awareness of cost and value, i.e., the outcome achieved per dollar or burden spent, in delivery of care and research is necessary to bend the cost curve. Incorporation of these dimensions of care requires methodology development, prioritization, and ethical balance.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsChildComorbidityDelivery of Health CareHealth Care CostsHumansNeoplasmsPalliative CareAntineoplastic AgentsCancerChildrenHealthcareHealth economics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.