Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193295›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2016

Virulence Attributes and Antifungal Susceptibility Profile of Opportunistic Fungi Isolated from Ophthalmic Infections.

Hafize Sav, Havva Gül Ozdemir, Rabiye Altınbas, Nuri Kiraz, Macit Ilkit, Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hafize SavDivision of Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey. hafize.sav@hotmail.com.
Havva Gül OzdemirDivision of Ophthalmology, Medicosocial Health Center, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey.
Rabiye AltınbasDivision of Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey.
Nuri KirazDivision of Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34098, Istanbul, Turkey.
Macit IlkitDivision of Mycology, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Çukurova, Adana, Turkey.
Seyedmojtaba SeyedmousaviDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Istanbul University · TRCukurova University · TRErasmus MC · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Investigations of both virulence factors and antifungal susceptibility profiles are crucial for understanding the pathogenesis and prognosis of ophthalmic mycoses. In this study, we investigated the in vitro antifungal susceptibility of amphotericin B (AMB), voriconazole (VRC), and natamycin (NAT) against a set of 50 fungal isolates obtained from patients with ocular mycoses using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution method. In addition, putative virulence factor, such as secretory phospholipases and proteinases, and biofilm formation activity were analyzed. The geometric means (GMs) of the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the antifungals across all isolates were the following (in increasing order): VRC (0.70 μg/mL), AMB (0.81 μg/mL), and NAT (1.05 μg/mL). The highest activity against 14 Aspergillus strains was exhibited by VRC (GM MIC: 0.10 μg/mL), followed by AMB and NAT (GM MICs: 0.21 and 0.27 μg/mL), respectively. However, for 12 Fusarium spp., the GM MIC of VRC (2.66) was higher than those of NAT and AMB (GM MICs 1.3 and 0.8 μg/mL, respectively). Proteinase and phospholipase activity were observed in 30 % and 42 % of the isolates, respectively, whereas only 8 % of the isolates were able to produce biofilms. Phospholipase activity was observed in all Fusarium isolates, but not in any of the Aspergillus isolates. In contrast, biofilm-forming capability was detected in 25 % of the Fusarium isolates, but none of the Aspergillus isolates. The differences in the MICs of AMB, VRC, and NAT, biofilm-forming ability and proteinase and phospholipase activities among the isolates were not significant (p > 0.05). Overall, our study suggests no significant correlation between the antifungal susceptibility profiles and virulence attributes of ocular fungal isolates.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsBiofilmsEye DiseasesFungiHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMycosesNatamycinOpportunistic InfectionsPeptide HydrolasesPhospholipasesVirulenceVirulence FactorsVoriconazoleAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsNatamycinPeptide HydrolasesPhospholipasesVirulence FactorsVoriconazoleAntifungal susceptibility testingOcular fungal isolatesVirulence factors

Identifiers

PMID27193295
OpenAlexW2395222300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.