Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193273›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2013

Are Aristolochic Acids Responsible for the Chemical Defence of Aposematic Larvae of Battus polydamas (L.) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)?

A B B Morais, K S Brown, M A Stanton, K F Massuda, J R Trigo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Biological Activities of Organic Extracts of the GenusMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A B B MoraisLab de Ecologia Química, Depto de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Univ Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
K S BrownLab de Ecologia Química, Depto de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Univ Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
M A StantonLab de Ecologia Química, Depto de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Univ Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
K F MassudaLab de Ecologia Química, Depto de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Univ Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil.
J R TrigoLab de Ecologia Química, Depto de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Univ Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), CP 6109, 13083-970, Campinas, SP, Brasil. trigo@unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aristolochic acids (AAs) are thought to be responsible for the chemical protection of the aposematic larvae Battus polydamas (L.) (Papilionidae: Troidini) against predators. These compounds are sequestered by larvae from their Aristolochia (Aristolochiaceae) host plants. Studying the role of the chemical protection of the second and fifth instars of B. polydamas against potential predators, we found that the consumption of larvae by the carpenter ant Camponotus crassus Mayr and young chicks Gallus gallus domesticus was dependent on larval developmental stage. Second instars were more preyed upon than fifth instars; however, the assassin bug Montina confusa Stål was not deterred by chemical defences of the fifth instar B. polydamas. Laboratory bioassays with carpenter ants and young chicks using palatable baits topically treated with a pure commercial mixture of AAs I and AAs II in concentrations up to 100 times those previously found in B. polydamas larvae showed no activity. Similar results were found in field bioassays, where palatable baits treated as above were exposed to the guild of predators that attack B. polydamas larvae and were also consumed irrespective of the commercial AA concentration used. These results suggest that the mixture of AAs I and AAs II have no defensive role against predators, at least against those investigated in the present work. Other compounds present in Aristolochia host plants such as O-glycosylated AAs; benzylisoquinoline alkaloids; and mono-, sesqui-, di-, and triterpenes, which can be sequestered by Troidini, could act as deterrents against predators.

Indexed as

Aristolochic AcidsButterfliesAnimalsAntsAristolochiaLarvaAristolochic AcidsChemical ecologychemical specialisationprey–predator interactionssequestration of secondary compoundstritrophic interactions

Identifiers

PMID27193273
OpenAlexW2082592892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.