Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193236›Full record

ArticleScientific data2016

A curated and standardized adverse drug event resource to accelerate drug safety research.

Juan M Banda, Lee Evans, Rami S Vanguri, Nicholas P Tatonetti, Patrick B Ryan, Nigam H Shah

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 131 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
131citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

131 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Juan M BandaCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8499-824X
Lee EvansLTS Computing LLC, West Chester, Pennsylvania 19380, USA.
Rami S VanguriDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Nicholas P TatonettiDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Patrick B RyanJanssen Research &Development, LLC, Titusville, New Jersey 08869, USA.
Nigam H ShahCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA.

Funding

Systematic pharmacological targeting of the core mechanisms responsible for maintaining cancer cell stateU54CA209997 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CALIFANO, ANDREA, HONIG, BARRY H · 2016 to 2021
$10.9M
Mining health data for drug safety profilesR01GM101430 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Drug Effect Discovery Through Data Mining and Integrative Chemical BiologyR01GM107145 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TATONETTI, NICHOLAS P · 2014 to 2018
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA209997NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101430NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM107145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) during the post-marketing phase is one of the most important goals of drug safety surveillance. Spontaneous reporting systems (SRS) data, which are the mainstay of traditional drug safety surveillance, are used for hypothesis generation and to validate the newer approaches. The publicly available US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data requires substantial curation before they can be used appropriately, and applying different strategies for data cleaning and normalization can have material impact on analysis results. We provide a curated and standardized version of FAERS removing duplicate case records, applying standardized vocabularies with drug names mapped to RxNorm concepts and outcomes mapped to SNOMED-CT concepts, and pre-computed summary statistics about drug-outcome relationships for general consumption. This publicly available resource, along with the source code, will accelerate drug safety research by reducing the amount of time spent performing data management on the source FAERS reports, improving the quality of the underlying data, and enabling standardized analyses using common vocabularies.

Indexed as

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsDatabases, FactualDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID27193236
PMCPMC4872271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.