Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193106›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2016

Prognostic Factors for Morbimortality in Sleeve Gastrectomy. The Importance of the Learning Curve. A Spanish-Portuguese Multicenter Study.

Raquel Sánchez-Santos, Ricard Corcelles Codina, Ramon Vilallonga Puy, Salvadora Delgado Rivilla, Jose Vicente Ferrer Valls, Javier Foncillas Corvinos, Carlos Masdevall Noguera, Maria Socas Macias, Pedro Gomes, Carmen Balague Ponz and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Raquel Sánchez-SantosSociedad Española de Cirugía de la Obesidad y Enfermedades Metabólicas, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain. raquelsanchezsantos@gmail.com.
Ricard Corcelles CodinaHospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Ramon Vilallonga PuyHospital Universitario Valld´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Salvadora Delgado RivillaHospital Clinic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Vicente Ferrer VallsClinica Obesitas, Valencia, Spain.
Javier Foncillas CorvinosQuiron Salud-Hospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Masdevall NogueraHospital Universitari Sagrat Cor, Barcelona, Spain.
Maria Socas MaciasHospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, Sevilla, Spain.
Pedro GomesHospital Geral, Centro Hospitalar Univertario Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Carmen Balague PonzHospital Sant Pau UAB, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge De Tomas PalaciosHospital Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.
Sergio Ortiz SebastianHospital General de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
Andres Sanchez-PernauteHospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Julian Puche PlaHospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Daniel Del Castillo DejardinHospital Universitario de Reus, Tarragona, Spain.
Julen Abasolo VegaHospital de Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
Ester Mans MuntwylerHospital de Mataró, Mataró, Spain.
Ana Garcia NavarroHospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain.
Carlos Duran EscribanoHospital Virgen de la Paloma, Madrid, Spain.
Norberto Cassinello FernándezHospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Nieves Perez ClimentHospital Virgen de los Lirios, Alcoy, Spain.
Jose Antonio Gracia SolanasHospital Clínico de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Francisca Garcia-Moreno NisaHospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
Alberto Hernández MatiasHospital Universitario de Getafe. Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Victor Valentí AzcarateClinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Jose Eduardo Perez FolquesHospital Virgen del Castillo. Yecla, Murcia, Spain.
Inmaculada Navarro GarciaHospital Santa Lucia Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Eduardo Dominguez-Adame LanuzaHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain.
Sagrario Martinez CortijoHospital de Talavera de la Reina, Talavera de la Reina, Spain.
Jesus González FernándezCentro Médico Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComplications in sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can cast a shadow over the technique's good results and compromise its safety. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors for complications, and especially those that can potentially be modified to improve safety.

methodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study was carried out, involving the participation of 29 hospitals. Data was collected on demographic variables, associated comorbidities, technical modifications, the surgeon's experience, and postoperative morbimortality. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was carried out on risk factors (RFs) for the complications of leak/fistula, hemoperitoneum, pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, and death.

resultsThe following data were collected for 2882 patients: age, 43.85 ± 11.6. 32.9 % male; BMI 47.22 ± 8.79; 46.2 % hypertensive; 29.2 % diabetes2; 18.2 % smokers; bougie calibre ≥40 F 11.1 %; complications 11.7 % (2.8 % leaks, 2.7 % hemoperitoneum, 1.1 % pneumonia, 0.2 % pulmonary embolism); and death 0.6 %. RFs for complications were as follows: surgeon's experience < 20 patients, OR 1.72 (1.32-2.25); experience > 100 patients, OR 0.78 (0.69-0.87); DM2, OR1.48(1.12-1.95); probe > 40 F, OR 0.613 (0.429-0.876). Leak RFs were the following: smoking, OR1.93 (1.1-3.41); surgeon's experience < 20 patients, OR 2.4 (1.46-4.16); experience of 20-50 patients, OR 2.5 (1.3-4.86); experience >100 patients, OR 0.265 (0.11-0.63); distance to pylorus > 4 cm, OR 0.510 (0.29-0.91). RFs for death were as follows: smoking, OR 8.64 (2.63-28.34); DM2, OR 3.25 (1.1-9.99); distance to pylorus < 5 cm, OR 6.62 (1.63-27.02).

conclusionsThe safety of SG may be compromised by nonmodifiable factors such as age >65, patient comorbidities (DM2, hypertension), and prior treatment with anticoagulants, as well as by modifiable factors such as smoking, bougie size <40 F, distance to the pylorus <4 cm, and the surgeon's experience (<50-100 cases).

Indexed as

LaparoscopyLearning CurveAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleGastrectomyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorbidityObesity, MorbidPortugalPostoperative ComplicationsPrognosisRetrospective StudiesComplicationsLearning curveMortalityPrognostic factorsSleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.