Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27193016›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care2017

Estimation of a physician practice cost function.

Lukas Kwietniewski, Mareike Heimeshoff, Jonas Schreyögg

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lukas KwietniewskiHamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Mareike HeimeshoffHamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Jonas SchreyöggHamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany. jonas.schreyoegg@wiso.uni-hamburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe goal of the present paper is to provide evidence on the behavior of physician practice cost functions. DATA SOURCES: Our study is based on the data of 3686 physician practices in Germany for the years 2006 to 2008. STUDY

designWe apply a translog functional form and include a comprehensive set of variables that have not been previously used in this context. A system of four equations using three-stage least squares is estimated. PRINCIPAL

findingsWe find that a higher degree of specialization leads to a decrease in costs, whereas quality certification increases costs. Costs of group practices are higher than of solo practices. The latter finding can be explained by the existence of indivisibilities of expensive technical equipment. Smaller practices do not reach the critical mass to invest in certain technologies, which leads to differences in the type of health care services provided by different practice types.

conclusionsThis is the first study to use physician practices as the unit of observation and to consider the endogenous character of physician input. Our results suggest that identifying factors that influence physician practice costs is important for providing evidence-based physician payment systems and to enable decision-makers to set incentives effectively.

Indexed as

AdultEconomics, MedicalFemaleGermanyGroup PracticeHumansMaleMarkov ChainsMedicineMiddle AgedPractice Management, MedicalPractice Patterns, Physicians'Private PracticeSpecializationSurveys and QuestionnairesEconomies of scalePhysician practice cost functionSpecializationThree-stage least squares

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.