Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27192997›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2016

Impact of shade on outdoor thermal comfort-a seasonal field study in Tempe, Arizona.

Ariane Middel, Nancy Selover, Björn Hagen, Nalini Chhetri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Urban Microclimates and Their Relationship with Social Isolation: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Verification of the Perception of the Local Community concerning Air Quality Using ADMS-Roads Modeling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ariane MiddelSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, PO Box 875302, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5302, USA. ariane.middel@asu.edu.
Nancy SeloverSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, State Climate Office, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1058, USA.
Björn HagenSchool of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, PO Box 875302, Tempe, AZ, 85287-5302, USA.
Nalini ChhetriJulie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability, Arizona State University, PO Box 878009, Tempe, AZ, 85287-8009, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shade plays an important role in designing pedestrian-friendly outdoor spaces in hot desert cities. This study investigates the impact of photovoltaic canopy shade and tree shade on thermal comfort through meteorological observations and field surveys at a pedestrian mall on Arizona State University's Tempe campus. During the course of 1 year, on selected clear calm days representative of each season, we conducted hourly meteorological transects from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. and surveyed 1284 people about their thermal perception, comfort, and preferences. Shade lowered thermal sensation votes by approximately 1 point on a semantic differential 9-point scale, increasing thermal comfort in all seasons except winter. Shade type (tree or solar canopy) did not significantly impact perceived comfort, suggesting that artificial and natural shades are equally efficient in hot dry climates. Globe temperature explained 51 % of the variance in thermal sensation votes and was the only statistically significant meteorological predictor. Important non-meteorological factors included adaptation, thermal comfort vote, thermal preference, gender, season, and time of day. A regression of subjective thermal sensation on physiological equivalent temperature yielded a neutral temperature of 28.6 °C. The acceptable comfort range was 19.1 °C-38.1 °C with a preferred temperature of 20.8 °C. Respondents exposed to above neutral temperature felt more comfortable if they had been in air-conditioning 5 min prior to the survey, indicating a lagged response to outdoor conditions. Our study highlights the importance of active solar access management in hot urban areas to reduce thermal stress.

Indexed as

ThermosensingAdolescentAdultAgedArizonaFemaleHumansHumidityMaleMiddle AgedSeasonsSunlightTemperatureTreesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27192997
PMCPMC5127889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.