ArticleAmerican journal of men's health2018
A Survey on Main Semen Parameters in Natural Pregnancy and Intrauterine Insemination: Are There Any Significant Differences?
Article in American journal of men's health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Role of genetic variations and protein expression of β-Microsemino protein in intrauterine insemination outcome of unexplained infertile men: A case-control study.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024Article
- The statistical foundation of the reference population for semen analysis included in the sixth edition of the WHO manual: a critical reappraisal of the evidence.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Predictors of pregnancy and time to pregnancy in infertile men with idiopathic oligoasthenospermia pre- and post-coenzyme Q10 therapy.Andrologia · 2022Article
- Intrauterine insemination cycles: prediction of success and thresholds for poor prognosis and futile care.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a treatment of choice compared with other invasive and expensive techniques of assisted reproduction. Sperm quality is used to predict its outcome and success. Establishing threshold levels for sperm parameters is useful to avoid spending time and money to do other assisted reproductive techniques. This study was carried out to compare various semen parameters in a group of men eligible to participate in an IUI program with those of fertile men whose wives were pregnant at the time of the study. Two hundred and thirty-four semen samples were evaluated from subfertile men whose partners were candidates for IUI and 234 semen samples were evaluated from fertile men whose partners were pregnant less than 12 weeks. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the main semen parameters, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used. Normal sperm morphology is more sensitive and specific compared with its progressive motility and concentration. No significant differences in various semen parameters of fertile men and those of the male partners of IUI candidates were observed. ROC analysis identified that sperm normal morphology using strict criteria may be a good indicator of fertility status in men. No significant difference in various semen parameters between the male partners of IUI candidates and the fertile men was seen. However, utilizing ROC curves, sperm morphology using strict criteria could be a good predictor of fertility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.